Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) vs Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)
SPOT leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Omnicom Group Inc. and Spotify Technology S.A. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
$76.51Communication Services
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
$479.85Communication Services
Total return — OMC vs SPOT
growth of $100 · last 8yOMC +7.4%SPOT +222.0%SPOT compounded faster
OMC SPOT
OMC vs SPOT: by the numbers
- •SPOT is the larger company ($98.67B vs $21.81B market cap).
- •SPOT trades at the lower earnings multiple (38.22 vs 70.84 P/E).
- •SPOT converts more revenue to profit (15.43% vs 0.32% net margin).
- •SPOT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.40% vs 8.49% CAGR).
- •OMC pays a dividend (4.05% yield) while SPOT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, OMC or SPOT?
Metric tally: OMC 4 · SPOT 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSPOT(lower P/E)
GrowthSPOT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySPOT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | OMC | SPOT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 70.84 | 38.22● |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.43 |
| P/S ratio | 0.79● | 4.90 |
| P/B ratio | 1.66● | 10.84 |
| PEG ratio | 2.89 | 0.51● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.04● | 27.41 |
| FCF yield | 19.08%● | 3.71% |
Profitability
| Metric | OMC | SPOT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 16.76% | 32.31%● |
| Operating margin | 13.70% | 13.70% |
| Net margin | 0.32% | 15.43%● |
| ROE | 0.67% | 34.17%● |
| ROIC | 1.48% | 21.05%● |
Dividends
| Metric | OMC | SPOT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.05% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | OMC | SPOT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.49% | 16.40%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.36% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.43% | 66.97%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.92% | 14.60%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, OMC or SPOT?
- It depends on your goal. value: SPOT (lower P/E); growth: SPOT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SPOT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SPOT leads 9 to 4.
- Is OMC or SPOT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SPOT is cheaper: OMC trades at a 70.84 P/E and SPOT at 38.22.
- Which has grown faster, OMC or SPOT?
- Over the past five years, SPOT grew revenue faster — OMC at a 8.49% CAGR versus SPOT at 16.40%.
- Does OMC or SPOT pay a bigger dividend?
- OMC pays a dividend (4.05% yield) while SPOT does not currently pay one.
- Is OMC or SPOT more profitable?
- SPOT runs the higher net margin — OMC at 0.32% versus SPOT at 15.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, OMC or SPOT?
- Over the past 5-year, SPOT delivered the higher annualized total return — OMC at 2.89% versus SPOT at 14.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Omnicom P/E ratioSpotify Technology P/E ratioOmnicom dividend yieldSpotify Technology dividend yieldOmnicom ROESpotify Technology ROEOmnicom operating marginSpotify Technology operating marginOmnicom revenue growthSpotify Technology revenue growthOmnicom free cash flowSpotify Technology free cash flow
Omnicom & Spotify Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.