Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ODFL
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
$225.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$97.37IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT
Total return — ODFL vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yODFL +38283.0%TRI +370.1%ODFL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ODFL TRI
ODFL vs TRI: by the numbers
- •ODFL is the larger company ($46.96B vs $42.51B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.82 vs 47.83 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •ODFL grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.60% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.30% vs 0.50%).
Which is better, ODFL or TRI?
Metric tally: ODFL 5 · TRI 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthODFL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityODFL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ODFL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 47.83 | 26.82● |
| Forward P/E | 41.07 | 21.18● |
| P/S ratio | 8.77 | 5.24● |
| P/B ratio | 10.88 | 3.39● |
| PEG ratio | 4.29 | 3.72● |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.87 | 14.11● |
| FCF yield | 2.13% | 5.21%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ODFL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.91% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 24.57% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 18.46% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 22.89%● | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 19.91%● | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | ODFL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 4.30%● |
| Payout ratio | 23.51% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ODFL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.60%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.14%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.53% | 9.45%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.62%● | -1.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ODFL or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: ODFL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: ODFL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 12 to 5.
- Is ODFL or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: ODFL trades at a 47.83 P/E and TRI at 26.82.
- Which has grown faster, ODFL or TRI?
- Over the past five years, ODFL grew revenue faster — ODFL at a 5.60% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does ODFL or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- ODFL yields 0.50% and TRI yields 4.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ODFL or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — ODFL at 18.46% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, ODFL or TRI?
- Over the past 10-year, ODFL delivered the higher annualized total return — ODFL at 27.09% versus TRI at 8.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Old Dominion Freight Line P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioOld Dominion Freight Line dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldOld Dominion Freight Line ROEThomson Reuters ROEOld Dominion Freight Line operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginOld Dominion Freight Line revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthOld Dominion Freight Line free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Old Dominion Freight Line & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 14, 2026.