Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) vs United States Steel Corporation (X)
NTR leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Nutrien Ltd. and United States Steel Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
$64.28Basic Materials
X
United States Steel Corporation
$54.84Basic Materials
Total return — NTR vs X
growth of $100 · last 7yNTR +11.3%X +55.8%X compounded faster
NTR X
NTR vs X: by the numbers
- •NTR is the larger company ($30.93B vs $12.42B market cap).
- •NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.09 vs 189.10 P/E).
- •NTR converts more revenue to profit (8.58% vs 0.64% net margin).
- •NTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.38% vs 4.51% CAGR).
- •NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.40% vs 0.36%).
Which is better, NTR or X?
Metric tally: NTR 10 · X 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTR(lower P/E)
GrowthNTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)
QualityNTR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NTR | X |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.09● | 189.10 |
| Forward P/E | 12.17 | — |
| P/S ratio | 1.11 | 0.81● |
| P/B ratio | 1.23 | 0.77● |
| PEG ratio | 0.05 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.99● | 10.84 |
| FCF yield | 7.20% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | NTR | X |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.16%● | 7.57% |
| Operating margin | 14.15%● | -2.36% |
| Net margin | 8.58%● | 0.64% |
| ROE | 9.46%● | 0.61% |
| ROIC | 6.79%● | 1.24% |
Dividends
| Metric | NTR | X |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.40%● | 0.36% |
| Payout ratio | 46.10% | 11.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NTR | X |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.38%● | 4.51% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 41.02%● | -19.55% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.42% | 24.58%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 47.40%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NTR or X?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: NTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: NTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 10 to 4.
- Is NTR or X cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: NTR trades at a 13.09 P/E and X at 189.10.
- Which has grown faster, NTR or X?
- Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — NTR at a 5.38% CAGR versus X at 4.51%.
- Does NTR or X pay a bigger dividend?
- NTR yields 3.40% and X yields 0.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NTR or X more profitable?
- NTR runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.58% versus X at 0.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, NTR or X?
- Over the past 5-year, X delivered the higher annualized total return — NTR at 5.10% versus X at 9.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nutrien P/E ratioUnited States Steel P/E ratioNutrien dividend yieldUnited States Steel dividend yieldNutrien ROEUnited States Steel ROENutrien operating marginUnited States Steel operating marginNutrien revenue growthUnited States Steel revenue growthNutrien free cash flowUnited States Steel free cash flow
Nutrien & United States Steel appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.