Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
NTR leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Nutrien Ltd. and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
$65.48Basic Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$320.24Basic Materials
Total return — NTR vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 8yNTR +19.6%SHW +135.8%SHW compounded faster
NTR SHW
NTR vs SHW: by the numbers
- •SHW is the larger company ($79.49B vs $31.51B market cap).
- •NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.34 vs 30.73 P/E).
- •SHW converts more revenue to profit (10.86% vs 8.58% net margin).
- •NTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.38% vs 4.87% CAGR).
- •NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.34% vs 0.99%).
Which is better, NTR or SHW?
Metric tally: NTR 11 · SHW 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTR(lower P/E)
GrowthNTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.34● | 30.73 |
| Forward P/E | 12.40● | 27.32 |
| P/S ratio | 1.13● | 3.32 |
| P/B ratio | 1.25● | 17.93 |
| PEG ratio | 0.05● | 4.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.09● | 20.80 |
| FCF yield | 7.07%● | 3.66% |
Profitability
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.16% | 49.12%● |
| Operating margin | 14.15% | 16.13%● |
| Net margin | 8.58% | 10.86%● |
| ROE | 9.46% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 6.79% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.34%● | 0.99% |
| Payout ratio | 46.10% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.38%● | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 41.02%● | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.42%● | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.60% | 4.66% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NTR or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: NTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 11 to 5.
- Is NTR or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: NTR trades at a 13.34 P/E and SHW at 30.73.
- Which has grown faster, NTR or SHW?
- Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — NTR at a 5.38% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does NTR or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- NTR yields 3.34% and SHW yields 0.99% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NTR or SHW more profitable?
- SHW runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.58% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, NTR or SHW?
- Over the past 5-year, SHW delivered the higher annualized total return — NTR at 4.60% versus SHW at 13.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nutrien P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioNutrien dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldNutrien ROESherwin-Williams ROENutrien operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginNutrien revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthNutrien free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Nutrien & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.