National Research Corporation (NRC) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UHS leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of National Research Corporation and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NRC
National Research Corporation
$20.81Healthcare
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$145.69Healthcare
Total return — NRC vs UHS
growth of $100 · last 13yNRC +4.0%UHS +117.4%UHS compounded faster
NRC UHS
NRC vs UHS: by the numbers
- •UHS is the larger company ($9.12B vs $469M market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower earnings multiple (6.11 vs 52.33 P/E).
- •UHS converts more revenue to profit (8.56% vs 6.52% net margin).
- •UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 0.55% CAGR).
- •NRC pays the higher dividend yield (3.08% vs 0.55%).
Which is better, NRC or UHS?
Metric tally: NRC 4 · UHS 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUHS(lower P/E)
GrowthUHS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNRC(higher dividend yield)
QualityNRC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NRC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 52.33 | 6.11● |
| Forward P/E | 23.65 | 6.21● |
| P/S ratio | 3.29 | 0.51● |
| P/B ratio | 33.79 | 1.19● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.11 | 5.25● |
| FCF yield | 3.82% | 9.94%● |
Profitability
| Metric | NRC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.85% | 90.45%● |
| Operating margin | 14.11%● | 11.50% |
| Net margin | 6.52% | 8.56%● |
| ROE | 66.94%● | 20.19% |
| ROIC | 14.36%● | 11.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | NRC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.08%● | 0.55% |
| Payout ratio | 123.08% | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NRC | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.55% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.88% | 16.19%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -17.24% | -4.64%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -12.81% | -0.22%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NRC or UHS?
- It depends on your goal. value: UHS (lower P/E); growth: UHS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NRC (higher dividend yield); quality: NRC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 12 to 4.
- Is NRC or UHS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UHS is cheaper: NRC trades at a 52.33 P/E and UHS at 6.11.
- Which has grown faster, NRC or UHS?
- Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — NRC at a 0.55% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does NRC or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- NRC yields 3.08% and UHS yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NRC or UHS more profitable?
- UHS runs the higher net margin — NRC at 6.52% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, NRC or UHS?
- Over the past 10-year, NRC delivered the higher annualized total return — NRC at 6.34% versus UHS at 1.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
National Research P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioNational Research dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldNational Research ROEUniversal Health Services ROENational Research operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginNational Research revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthNational Research free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
National Research & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.