Which has grown faster, NIO or RMBS?

Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — NIO at a 33.07% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.

Is NIO or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — NIO at -8.84% versus RMBS at 31.89%.

Which has been the better investment, NIO or RMBS?

Over the past 5-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — NIO at -35.21% versus RMBS at 28.27%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NIO Inc. (NIO) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

RMBS leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of NIO Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

NIO

NIO Inc.

$12.28B

$5.21Consumer Cyclical

Total return — NIO vs RMBS

growth of $100 · last 8y

NIO -21.1%RMBS +1193.6%RMBS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NIO RMBS

NIO vs RMBS: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($15.85B vs $12.28B market cap).
•RMBS is profitable (31.89% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-8.84%).
•NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.07% vs 23.51% CAGR).

Which is better, NIO or RMBS?

Metric tally: NIO 3 · RMBS 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNIO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRMBS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NIO	RMBS
P/E ratio	—	69.79
Forward P/E	8.59●	49.34
P/S ratio	0.90●	22.30
P/B ratio	20.55	11.54●
PEG ratio	—	1.53
EV / EBITDA	—	52.03
FCF yield	—	2.08%

Profitability

Metric	NIO	RMBS
Gross margin	15.74%	77.03%●
Operating margin	-8.06%	35.89%●
Net margin	-8.84%	31.89%●
ROE	-200.85%	16.51%●
ROIC	-26.94%	15.03%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NIO	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	33.07%●	23.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	48.76%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	16.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-35.21%	49.06%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, NIO or RMBS?: It depends on your goal. growth: NIO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RMBS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RMBS leads 7 to 3.
Which has grown faster, NIO or RMBS?: Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — NIO at a 33.07% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.
Is NIO or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — NIO at -8.84% versus RMBS at 31.89%.
Which has been the better investment, NIO or RMBS?: Over the past 5-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — NIO at -35.21% versus RMBS at 28.27%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NIO analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

NIO P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio NIO dividend yield Rambus dividend yield NIO ROE Rambus ROE NIO operating margin Rambus operating margin NIO revenue growth Rambus revenue growth NIO free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

NIO & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.