Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
NCLH leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
$19.37Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — NCLH vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yNCLH -21.9%SIMO +2368.1%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NCLH SIMO
NCLH vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $8.89B market cap).
- •NCLH trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.32 vs 21.10 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 5.66% net margin).
- •NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (208.16% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while NCLH does not currently pay one.
Which is better, NCLH or SIMO?
Metric tally: NCLH 8 · SIMO 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNCLH(lower P/E)
GrowthNCLH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NCLH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.32● | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 11.63● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.90● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 3.71 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.08● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | NCLH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.97% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 15.88%● | 12.77% |
| Net margin | 5.66% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 23.37%● | 18.76% |
| ROIC | 8.75% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | NCLH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NCLH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 208.16%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 44.85% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 35.22%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.87% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NCLH or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: NCLH (lower P/E); growth: NCLH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NCLH leads 8 to 5.
- Is NCLH or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NCLH is cheaper: NCLH trades at a 16.32 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, NCLH or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — NCLH at a 208.16% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does NCLH or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while NCLH does not currently pay one.
- Is NCLH or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — NCLH at 5.66% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, NCLH or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — NCLH at -7.25% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioNorwegian Cruise Line dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldNorwegian Cruise Line ROESilicon Motion Technology ROENorwegian Cruise Line operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginNorwegian Cruise Line revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthNorwegian Cruise Line free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Norwegian Cruise Line & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.