Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) vs Plexus Corp. (PLXS)
PLXS leads on 6 of 11 compared metrics, though NAD is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund and Plexus Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
$11.61Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
PLXS
Plexus Corp.
$254.45TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — NAD vs PLXS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27yNAD +296.0%PLXS +1413.5%PLXS compounded faster
NAD PLXS
NAD vs PLXS: by the numbers
- •PLXS is the larger company ($6.81B vs $2.71B market cap).
- •NAD trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.16 vs 37.20 P/E).
- •NAD converts more revenue to profit (56.66% vs 4.35% net margin).
- •PLXS grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.36% vs 0.03% CAGR).
- •NAD pays a dividend (7.37% yield) while PLXS does not currently pay one.
Which is better, NAD or PLXS?
Metric tally: NAD 5 · PLXS 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNAD(lower P/E)
GrowthPLXS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPLXS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NAD | PLXS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.16● | 37.20 |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.04 |
| P/S ratio | 6.37 | 1.62● |
| P/B ratio | 0.97● | 4.67 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 23.07 |
| FCF yield | — | 1.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | NAD | PLXS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.73%● | 10.05% |
| Operating margin | 69.73%● | 5.17% |
| Net margin | 56.66%● | 4.35% |
| ROE | 8.64% | 12.59%● |
| ROIC | 2.93% | 11.13%● |
Dividends
| Metric | NAD | PLXS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 7.37% | — |
| Payout ratio | 305.71% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NAD | PLXS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.03% | 4.36%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -10.59% | 10.10%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -18.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.75% | 24.12%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NAD or PLXS?
- It depends on your goal. value: NAD (lower P/E); growth: PLXS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PLXS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PLXS leads 6 to 5.
- Is NAD or PLXS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NAD is cheaper: NAD trades at a 11.16 P/E and PLXS at 37.20.
- Which has grown faster, NAD or PLXS?
- Over the past five years, PLXS grew revenue faster — NAD at a 0.03% CAGR versus PLXS at 4.36%.
- Does NAD or PLXS pay a bigger dividend?
- NAD pays a dividend (7.37% yield) while PLXS does not currently pay one.
- Is NAD or PLXS more profitable?
- NAD runs the higher net margin — NAD at 56.66% versus PLXS at 4.35%.
- Which has been the better investment, NAD or PLXS?
- Over the past 10-year, PLXS delivered the higher annualized total return — NAD at 2.44% versus PLXS at 18.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioPlexus P/E ratioNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldPlexus dividend yieldNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEPlexus ROENuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginPlexus operating marginNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthPlexus revenue growthNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flowPlexus free cash flow
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund & Plexus appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.