Is MU or TGT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TGT is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and TGT at 17.86.

Which has grown faster, MU or TGT?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus TGT at 1.62%.

Does MU or TGT pay a bigger dividend?

MU yields 0.05% and TGT yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MU or TGT more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus TGT at 3.24%.

Which has been the better investment, MU or TGT?

Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus TGT at 10.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Target Corporation (TGT)

MU leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though TGT is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Micron Technology, Inc.

$135.23Consumer Defensive

Not enough overlapping price history to compare MU and TGT.

MU vs TGT: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $61.42B market cap).
•TGT trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.86 vs 46.32 P/E).
•MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 3.24% net margin).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 1.62% CAGR).
•TGT pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 0.05%).

Which is better, MU or TGT?

Metric tally: MU 9 · TGT 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTGT(lower P/E)

GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeTGT(higher dividend yield)

QualityMU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	MU	TGT
P/E ratio	46.32	17.86●
Forward P/E	—	15.09
P/S ratio	19.25	0.58●
P/B ratio	15.44	3.76●
PEG ratio	0.02	—
EV / EBITDA	30.08	7.81●
FCF yield	0.92%	6.75%●

Profitability

Metric	MU	TGT
Gross margin	58.44%●	28.14%
Operating margin	48.52%●	4.49%
Net margin	41.49%●	3.24%
ROE	33.28%●	21.04%
ROIC	12.12%●	9.76%

Dividends

Metric	MU	TGT
Dividend yield	0.05%	3.37%●
Payout ratio	6.47%	55.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MU	TGT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.34%●	1.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.12%●	-1.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	140.90%●	-12.12%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	66.18%●	-7.66%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MU or TGT?: It depends on your goal. value: TGT (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TGT (higher dividend yield); quality: MU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 9 to 6.
Is MU or TGT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TGT is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and TGT at 17.86.
Which has grown faster, MU or TGT?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus TGT at 1.62%.
Does MU or TGT pay a bigger dividend?: MU yields 0.05% and TGT yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MU or TGT more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus TGT at 3.24%.
Which has been the better investment, MU or TGT?: Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus TGT at 10.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MU analysis Full TGT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Micron Technology P/E ratio Target P/E ratio Micron Technology dividend yield Target dividend yield Micron Technology ROE Target ROE Micron Technology operating margin Target operating margin Micron Technology revenue growth Target revenue growth Micron Technology free cash flow Target free cash flow

Micron Technology & Target appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.