Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
MU leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$981.61Technology
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$294.75Industrials
Total return — MU vs POWL
growth of $100 · last 30yMU +6387.8%POWL +7124.3%POWL compounded faster
MU POWL
MU vs POWL: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $10.74B market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower earnings multiple (46.32 vs 57.61 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 16.51% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 19.84% CAGR).
- •POWL pays the higher dividend yield (0.12% vs 0.05%).
Which is better, MU or POWL?
Metric tally: MU 9 · POWL 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMU(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MU | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.32● | 57.61 |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.88 |
| P/S ratio | 19.25 | 9.51● |
| P/B ratio | 15.44 | 15.19 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 1.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.08● | 41.17 |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | 1.79%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.44%● | 30.10% |
| Operating margin | 48.52%● | 19.76% |
| Net margin | 41.49%● | 16.51% |
| ROE | 33.28%● | 26.36% |
| ROIC | 12.12% | 25.41%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | 0.12%● |
| Payout ratio | 6.47% | 7.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.34%● | 19.84% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.12% | 59.98%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 140.90%● | 34.56% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 66.18% | 99.30%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MU or POWL?
- It depends on your goal. value: MU (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 9 to 6.
- Is MU or POWL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
- Which has grown faster, MU or POWL?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
- Does MU or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- MU yields 0.05% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MU or POWL more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus POWL at 16.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, MU or POWL?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldPowell Industries dividend yieldMicron Technology ROEPowell Industries ROEMicron Technology operating marginPowell Industries operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
Micron Technology & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.