Which has grown faster, MTZ or SYM?

Over the past five years, SYM grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 18.00% CAGR versus SYM at 68.05%.

Is MTZ or SYM more profitable?

MTZ runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.00% versus SYM at -0.20%.

Which has been the better investment, MTZ or SYM?

Over the past 5-year, SYM delivered the higher annualized total return — MTZ at 33.99% versus SYM at 35.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) vs Symbotic Inc. (SYM)

MTZ leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of MasTec, Inc. and Symbotic Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 1, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — MTZ vs SYM

growth of $100 · last 5y

MTZ +343.0%SYM +338.5%MTZ compounded faster

MTZ SYM

MTZ vs SYM: by the numbers

•MTZ is the larger company ($30.56B vs $29.93B market cap).
•MTZ is profitable (3.00% net margin) while SYM runs a net loss (-0.20%).
•SYM grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.05% vs 18.00% CAGR).

Which is better, MTZ or SYM?

Metric tally: MTZ 7 · SYM 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSYM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMTZ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTZ	SYM
P/E ratio	72.87	—
Forward P/E	35.74●	55.21
P/S ratio	2.15●	2.40
P/B ratio	9.90	8.80●
PEG ratio	0.29	—
EV / EBITDA	29.01●	144.87
FCF yield	0.78%	12.39%●

Profitability

Metric	MTZ	SYM
Gross margin	11.30%	20.58%●
Operating margin	5.65%●	-0.80%
Net margin	3.00%●	-0.20%
ROE	13.86%●	-0.72%
ROIC	7.44%●	-13.32%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTZ	SYM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.00%	68.05%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.94%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-19.53%	98.71%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.43%	35.23%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MTZ or SYM?: It depends on your goal. growth: SYM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MTZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTZ leads 7 to 6.
Which has grown faster, MTZ or SYM?: Over the past five years, SYM grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 18.00% CAGR versus SYM at 68.05%.
Is MTZ or SYM more profitable?: MTZ runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.00% versus SYM at -0.20%.
Which has been the better investment, MTZ or SYM?: Over the past 5-year, SYM delivered the higher annualized total return — MTZ at 33.99% versus SYM at 35.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTZ analysis Full SYM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MasTec P/E ratio Symbotic P/E ratio MasTec dividend yield Symbotic dividend yield MasTec ROE Symbotic ROE MasTec operating margin Symbotic operating margin MasTec revenue growth Symbotic revenue growth MasTec free cash flow Symbotic free cash flow

MasTec & Symbotic appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 1, 2026.