On trailing earnings, MTZ is cheaper: MTZ trades at a 67.06 P/E and P at 117.77.

Which has grown faster, MTZ or P?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 18.00% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.

Is MTZ or P more profitable?

P runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.00% versus P at 5.75%.

Which has been the better investment, MTZ or P?

Over the past 10-year, MTZ delivered the higher annualized total return — MTZ at 31.80% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)

MTZ leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of MasTec, Inc. and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — MTZ vs P

growth of $100 · last 11y

MTZ +2058.4%P +357.2%MTZ compounded faster

MTZ P

MTZ vs P: by the numbers

•MTZ is the larger company ($30.40B vs $26.92B market cap).
•MTZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (67.06 vs 117.77 P/E).
•P converts more revenue to profit (5.75% vs 3.00% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.00% vs 17.87% CAGR).

Which is better, MTZ or P?

Metric tally: MTZ 8 · P 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMTZ(lower P/E)

QualityMTZ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTZ	P
P/E ratio	67.06●	117.77
Forward P/E	43.37	39.95●
P/S ratio	1.97●	6.45
P/B ratio	9.12●	17.60
PEG ratio	0.29●	2.96
EV / EBITDA	26.88●	77.38
FCF yield	0.85%●	0.62%

Profitability

Metric	MTZ	P
Gross margin	11.30%	70.23%●
Operating margin	5.65%●	4.21%
Net margin	3.00%	5.75%●
ROE	13.86%	15.69%●
ROIC	7.44%●	3.43%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTZ	P
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.00%	17.87%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.94%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-19.53%	15.82%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	30.54%	32.78%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MTZ or P?: It depends on your goal. value: MTZ (lower P/E); quality: MTZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTZ leads 8 to 6.
Is MTZ or P cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MTZ is cheaper: MTZ trades at a 67.06 P/E and P at 117.77.
Which has grown faster, MTZ or P?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 18.00% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
Is MTZ or P more profitable?: P runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.00% versus P at 5.75%.
Which has been the better investment, MTZ or P?: Over the past 10-year, MTZ delivered the higher annualized total return — MTZ at 31.80% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTZ analysis Full P analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MasTec P/E ratio Everpure P/E ratio MasTec dividend yield Everpure dividend yield MasTec ROE Everpure ROE MasTec operating margin Everpure operating margin MasTec revenue growth Everpure revenue growth MasTec free cash flow Everpure free cash flow

MasTec & Everpure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.