Is MTD or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MTD is cheaper: MTD trades at a 26.49 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, MTD or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — MTD at a 4.77% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does MTD or RL pay a bigger dividend?

RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while MTD does not currently pay one.

Is MTD or RL more profitable?

MTD runs the higher net margin — MTD at 21.40% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, MTD or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — MTD at 11.96% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MTD

Mettler-Toledo International Inc.

$23.32B

$1131.49Healthcare

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — MTD vs RL

growth of $100 · last 29y

MTD +7506.7%RL +1389.1%MTD compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MTD RL

MTD vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $23.32B market cap).
•MTD trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.49 vs 26.74 P/E).
•MTD converts more revenue to profit (21.40% vs 11.60% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 4.77% CAGR).
•RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while MTD does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MTD or RL?

Metric tally: MTD 5 · RL 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMTD(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTD	RL
P/E ratio	26.49	26.74
Forward P/E	22.12	22.03
P/S ratio	5.61	3.10●
P/B ratio	—	8.86
PEG ratio	8.96	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	20.60●	22.22
FCF yield	3.46%●	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	MTD	RL
Gross margin	57.79%	69.87%●
Operating margin	28.00%●	14.53%
Net margin	21.40%●	11.60%
ROE	-3677.41%	33.13%●
ROIC	35.46%●	19.62%

Dividends

Metric	MTD	RL
Dividend yield	—	0.90%
Payout ratio	—	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTD	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.77%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.81%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.98%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-3.23%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MTD or RL?: It depends on your goal. growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MTD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 8 to 5.
Is MTD or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MTD is cheaper: MTD trades at a 26.49 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, MTD or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — MTD at a 4.77% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does MTD or RL pay a bigger dividend?: RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while MTD does not currently pay one.
Is MTD or RL more profitable?: MTD runs the higher net margin — MTD at 21.40% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, MTD or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — MTD at 11.96% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTD analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mettler-Toledo International P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Mettler-Toledo International dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Mettler-Toledo International ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Mettler-Toledo International operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Mettler-Toledo International revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Mettler-Toledo International free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Mettler-Toledo International & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.