Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)
TRNO leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Microsoft Corporation and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$390.74Technology
TRNO
Terreno Realty Corporation
$67.27Real Estate
Total return — MSFT vs TRNO
growth of $100 · last 16yMSFT +1296.0%TRNO +260.7%MSFT compounded faster
MSFT TRNO
MSFT vs TRNO: by the numbers
- •MSFT is the larger company ($2.90T vs $7.15B market cap).
- •TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 23.26 P/E).
- •TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 39.34% net margin).
- •TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 14.75% CAGR).
- •TRNO pays the higher dividend yield (3.05% vs 0.91%).
Which is better, MSFT or TRNO?
Metric tally: MSFT 7 · TRNO 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRNO(lower P/E)
GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRNO(higher dividend yield)
QualityMSFT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MSFT | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.26 | 16.49● |
| Forward P/E | 20.11● | 40.04 |
| P/S ratio | 9.14● | 14.43 |
| P/B ratio | 7.02 | 1.65● |
| PEG ratio | 2.34 | 0.14● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.60 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 2.51% | 2.87%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MSFT | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.31%● | 63.89% |
| Operating margin | 46.80%● | 40.81% |
| Net margin | 39.34% | 86.52%● |
| ROE | 30.22%● | 9.88% |
| ROIC | 21.63%● | 3.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | MSFT | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 3.05%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.99% | 52.16% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MSFT | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.75% | 20.57%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.68% | 35.52%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.27% | 22.41%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.56%● | 3.07% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MSFT or TRNO?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRNO (higher dividend yield); quality: MSFT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 10 to 7.
- Is MSFT or TRNO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: MSFT trades at a 23.26 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
- Which has grown faster, MSFT or TRNO?
- Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — MSFT at a 14.75% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
- Does MSFT or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?
- MSFT yields 0.91% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MSFT or TRNO more profitable?
- TRNO runs the higher net margin — MSFT at 39.34% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, MSFT or TRNO?
- Over the past 10-year, MSFT delivered the higher annualized total return — MSFT at 23.98% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Microsoft P/E ratioTerreno Realty P/E ratioMicrosoft dividend yieldTerreno Realty dividend yieldMicrosoft ROETerreno Realty ROEMicrosoft operating marginTerreno Realty operating marginMicrosoft revenue growthTerreno Realty revenue growthMicrosoft free cash flowTerreno Realty free cash flow
Microsoft & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.