Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC) vs Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF)

A side-by-side comparison of Studio City International Holdings Limited and Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 25, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnMSC vs WOOF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
MSC -86.8% (-28.7%/yr)WOOF -90.2% (-32.1%/yr)MSC compounded faster over this window
050100Start $10020222023202420252026$13$10
MSC WOOF

MSC vs WOOF: by the numbers

  • WOOF is the larger company ($822M vs $88M market cap).
  • WOOF is profitable (0.09% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-7.57%).
  • MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (52.00% vs 2.70% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMSCWOOF
P/E ratioN/A154.01
P/S ratio0.130.14
P/B ratio0.180.71
EV / EBITDA6.8710.59
FCF yield41.32%28.41%

Profitability

MetricMSCWOOF
Gross margin61.61%38.72%
Operating margin10.86%2.16%
Net margin-7.57%0.09%
ROE-10.69%0.48%
ROIC2.94%1.93%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMSCWOOF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)52.00%2.70%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A6.87%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-28.60%-33.18%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MSC or WOOF?
Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — MSC at a 52.00% CAGR versus WOOF at 2.70%.
Is MSC or WOOF more profitable?
WOOF runs the higher net margin — MSC at -7.57% versus WOOF at 0.09%.
How have MSC and WOOF total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, MSC delivered -28.60% and WOOF delivered -33.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 25, 2026.