Which has grown faster, MSC or WOOF?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — MSC at a 69.81% CAGR versus WOOF at 3.91%.

Is MSC or WOOF more profitable?

WOOF runs the higher net margin — MSC at -5.63% versus WOOF at 0.09%.

Which has been the better investment, MSC or WOOF?

Over the past 5-year, MSC delivered the higher annualized total return — MSC at -30.17% versus WOOF at -34.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC) vs Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF)

MSC leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Studio City International Holdings Limited and Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 11, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$87M

$1.76Consumer Cyclical

WOOF

Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.

$731M

$2.56Consumer Cyclical

Total return — MSC vs WOOF

growth of $100 · last 5y

MSC -86.6%WOOF -91.3%MSC compounded faster

MSC WOOF

MSC vs WOOF: by the numbers

•WOOF is the larger company ($731M vs $87M market cap).
•WOOF is profitable (0.09% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.81% vs 3.91% CAGR).

Which is better, MSC or WOOF?

Metric tally: MSC 7 · WOOF 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMSC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MSC	WOOF
P/E ratio	—	136.36
P/S ratio	0.12	0.12
P/B ratio	0.17●	0.63
EV / EBITDA	6.89●	10.30
FCF yield	—	32.05%

Profitability

Metric	MSC	WOOF
Gross margin	68.05%●	38.72%
Operating margin	11.60%●	2.16%
Net margin	-5.63%	0.09%●
ROE	-7.94%	0.48%●
ROIC	2.68%●	1.63%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MSC	WOOF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	69.81%●	3.91%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-20.72%	-0.41%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-30.17%●	-34.67%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MSC or WOOF?: It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MSC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSC leads 7 to 3.
Which has grown faster, MSC or WOOF?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — MSC at a 69.81% CAGR versus WOOF at 3.91%.
Is MSC or WOOF more profitable?: WOOF runs the higher net margin — MSC at -5.63% versus WOOF at 0.09%.
Which has been the better investment, MSC or WOOF?: Over the past 5-year, MSC delivered the higher annualized total return — MSC at -30.17% versus WOOF at -34.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MSC analysis Full WOOF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Studio City International P/E ratio Petco Health and Wellness P/E ratio Studio City International dividend yield Petco Health and Wellness dividend yield Studio City International ROE Petco Health and Wellness ROE Studio City International operating margin Petco Health and Wellness operating margin Studio City International revenue growth Petco Health and Wellness revenue growth Studio City International free cash flow Petco Health and Wellness free cash flow

Studio City International & Petco Health and Wellness appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 11, 2026.