Which has grown faster, MSC or THO?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — MSC at a 69.81% CAGR versus THO at 3.24%.

Does MSC or THO pay a bigger dividend?

THO pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.

Is MSC or THO more profitable?

THO runs the higher net margin — MSC at -5.63% versus THO at 2.66%.

Which has been the better investment, MSC or THO?

Over the past 5-year, THO delivered the higher annualized total return — MSC at -30.17% versus THO at 2.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC) vs Thor Industries, Inc. (THO)

MSC leads on 6 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Studio City International Holdings Limited and Thor Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 11, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$87M

$1.76Consumer Cyclical

THO

Thor Industries, Inc.

$3.79B

$72.86Consumer Cyclical

Total return — MSC vs THO

growth of $100 · last 8y

MSC -88.6%THO -6.5%THO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MSC THO

MSC vs THO: by the numbers

•THO is the larger company ($3.79B vs $87M market cap).
•THO is profitable (2.66% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.81% vs 3.24% CAGR).
•THO pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MSC or THO?

Metric tally: MSC 6 · THO 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTHO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MSC	THO
P/E ratio	—	14.66
Forward P/E	—	20.69
P/S ratio	0.12●	0.39
P/B ratio	0.17●	0.88
PEG ratio	—	3.85
EV / EBITDA	6.89●	8.56
FCF yield	—	5.23%

Profitability

Metric	MSC	THO
Gross margin	68.05%●	12.34%
Operating margin	11.60%●	2.54%
Net margin	-5.63%	2.66%●
ROE	-7.94%	6.04%●
ROIC	2.68%	4.73%●

Dividends

Metric	MSC	THO
Dividend yield	—	2.85%
Payout ratio	—	42.71%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MSC	THO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	69.81%●	3.24%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	3.81%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-20.72%	-11.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-30.17%	-6.11%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MSC or THO?: It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: THO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSC leads 6 to 5.
Which has grown faster, MSC or THO?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — MSC at a 69.81% CAGR versus THO at 3.24%.
Does MSC or THO pay a bigger dividend?: THO pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.
Is MSC or THO more profitable?: THO runs the higher net margin — MSC at -5.63% versus THO at 2.66%.
Which has been the better investment, MSC or THO?: Over the past 5-year, THO delivered the higher annualized total return — MSC at -30.17% versus THO at 2.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MSC analysis Full THO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Studio City International P/E ratio Thor Industries P/E ratio Studio City International dividend yield Thor Industries dividend yield Studio City International ROE Thor Industries ROE Studio City International operating margin Thor Industries operating margin Studio City International revenue growth Thor Industries revenue growth Studio City International free cash flow Thor Industries free cash flow

Studio City International & Thor Industries appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 11, 2026.