Which has grown faster, MP or WY?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.

Does MP or WY pay a bigger dividend?

WY pays a dividend (3.74% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is MP or WY more profitable?

WY runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus WY at 5.74%.

Which has been the better investment, MP or WY?

Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 7.62% versus WY at 0.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MP Materials Corp. (MP) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)

WY leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of MP Materials Corp. and Weyerhaeuser Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MP Materials Corp.

$9.21B

$51.71Basic Materials

Weyerhaeuser Company

$16.22B

$22.50Basic Materials

Total return — MP vs WY

growth of $100 · last 6y

MP +430.0%WY -1.1%MP compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MP WY

MP vs WY: by the numbers

•WY is the larger company ($16.22B vs $9.21B market cap).
•WY is profitable (5.74% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs -3.60% CAGR).
•WY pays a dividend (3.74% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MP or WY?

Metric tally: MP 2 · WY 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityWY(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MP	WY
P/E ratio	—	40.84
Forward P/E	302.32	66.75●
P/S ratio	30.38	2.34●
P/B ratio	4.44	1.72●
EV / EBITDA	—	20.52

Profitability

Metric	MP	WY
Gross margin	-2.40%	13.41%●
Operating margin	-39.42%	7.70%●
Net margin	-20.48%	5.74%●
ROE	-2.99%	4.21%●
ROIC	-2.36%	2.93%●

Dividends

Metric	MP	WY
Dividend yield	—	3.74%
Payout ratio	—	186.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MP	WY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.90%●	-3.60%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	-15.91%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	-17.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.62%●	-5.28%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MP or WY?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WY (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WY leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, MP or WY?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.
Does MP or WY pay a bigger dividend?: WY pays a dividend (3.74% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is MP or WY more profitable?: WY runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus WY at 5.74%.
Which has been the better investment, MP or WY?: Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 7.62% versus WY at 0.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MP analysis Full WY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MP Materials P/E ratio Weyerhaeuser P/E ratio MP Materials dividend yield Weyerhaeuser dividend yield MP Materials ROE Weyerhaeuser ROE MP Materials operating margin Weyerhaeuser operating margin MP Materials revenue growth Weyerhaeuser revenue growth MP Materials free cash flow Weyerhaeuser free cash flow

MP Materials & Weyerhaeuser appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.