MP Materials Corp. (MP) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 9 of 10 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of MP Materials Corp. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MP
MP Materials Corp.
$41.30Basic MaterialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — MP vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yMP +313.0%SIMO +598.2%SIMO compounded faster
MP SIMO
MP vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.35B market cap).
- •SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
- •MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MP or SIMO?
Metric tally: MP 1 · SIMO 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 314.88 | 30.51● |
| P/S ratio | 23.67 | 2.57● |
| P/B ratio | 3.46 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | MP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -2.40% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | -39.42% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | -20.48% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | -2.99% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | -2.36% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.90%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 44.85% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.01% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MP or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 9 to 1.
- Which has grown faster, MP or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does MP or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
- Is MP or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, MP or SIMO?
- Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 3.01% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
MP Materials P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioMP Materials dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldMP Materials ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEMP Materials operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginMP Materials revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthMP Materials free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
MP Materials & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.