Which has grown faster, MP or NTR?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.

Does MP or NTR pay a bigger dividend?

NTR pays a dividend (3.40% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is MP or NTR more profitable?

NTR runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus NTR at 8.58%.

Which has been the better investment, MP or NTR?

Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 14.24% versus NTR at 4.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MP Materials Corp. (MP) vs Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)

NTR leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of MP Materials Corp. and Nutrien Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MP Materials Corp.

$10.68B

$60.84Basic Materials

NTR

Nutrien Ltd.

$30.08B

$64.28Basic Materials

Total return — MP vs NTR

growth of $100 · last 6y

MP +499.5%NTR +75.5%MP compounded faster

MP NTR

MP vs NTR: by the numbers

•NTR is the larger company ($30.08B vs $10.68B market cap).
•NTR is profitable (8.58% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 5.38% CAGR).
•NTR pays a dividend (3.40% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MP or NTR?

Metric tally: MP 2 · NTR 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNTR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MP	NTR
P/E ratio	—	13.09
Forward P/E	55.55	12.18●
P/S ratio	34.87	1.11●
P/B ratio	5.09	1.23●
PEG ratio	—	0.05
EV / EBITDA	654.52	6.99●
FCF yield	—	7.20%

Profitability

Metric	MP	NTR
Gross margin	24.16%	31.16%●
Operating margin	-39.42%	14.15%●
Net margin	-20.48%	8.58%●
ROE	-2.99%	9.46%●
ROIC	-2.36%	6.79%●

Dividends

Metric	MP	NTR
Dividend yield	—	3.40%
Payout ratio	—	46.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MP	NTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.90%●	5.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	41.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	0.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.24%●	4.94%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MP or NTR?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, MP or NTR?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.
Does MP or NTR pay a bigger dividend?: NTR pays a dividend (3.40% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is MP or NTR more profitable?: NTR runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus NTR at 8.58%.
Which has been the better investment, MP or NTR?: Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 14.24% versus NTR at 4.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MP analysis Full NTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MP Materials P/E ratio Nutrien P/E ratio MP Materials dividend yield Nutrien dividend yield MP Materials ROE Nutrien ROE MP Materials operating margin Nutrien operating margin MP Materials revenue growth Nutrien revenue growth MP Materials free cash flow Nutrien free cash flow

MP Materials & Nutrien appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 18, 2026.