Altria Group, Inc. (MO) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
MO leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Altria Group, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
$73.21Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$144.45Consumer Defensive
Total return — MO vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yMO +111.8%STZ +3650.6%STZ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MO STZ
MO vs STZ: by the numbers
- •MO is the larger company ($122.63B vs $25.16B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.06 vs 15.32 P/E).
- •MO converts more revenue to profit (36.91% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.19% vs 1.08% CAGR).
- •MO pays the higher dividend yield (5.79% vs 2.85%).
Which is better, MO or STZ?
Metric tally: MO 8 · STZ 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMO(higher dividend yield)
QualityMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.32 | 15.06 |
| Forward P/E | 12.44 | 11.64● |
| P/S ratio | 5.61 | 2.75● |
| P/B ratio | — | 3.10 |
| PEG ratio | 1.35 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.72 | 11.02● |
| FCF yield | 7.04% | 7.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | MO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.59%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 74.80%● | 31.33% |
| Net margin | 36.91%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | -198.37% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 42.95%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | MO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.79%● | 2.85% |
| Payout ratio | 103.16% | 42.83% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.08% | 1.19%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.36%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.28%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.84%● | -6.85% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MO or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. growth: STZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MO (higher dividend yield); quality: MO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MO leads 8 to 5.
- Is MO or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: MO trades at a 15.32 P/E and STZ at 15.06.
- Which has grown faster, MO or STZ?
- Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — MO at a 1.08% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does MO or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- MO yields 5.79% and STZ yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MO or STZ more profitable?
- MO runs the higher net margin — MO at 36.91% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, MO or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, MO delivered the higher annualized total return — MO at 8.05% versus STZ at 1.18%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Altria P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioAltria dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldAltria ROEConstellation Brands ROEAltria operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginAltria revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthAltria free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Altria & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.