Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

MNST leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though QCOM is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare
Monster Beverage Corporation logo
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$90.79B
$92.83Consumer Defensive
QUALCOMM Incorporated logo
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$223.15B
$211.72Technology

Total return — MNST vs QCOM

growth of $100 · last 30y
MNST +570249.0%QCOM +7150.7%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100k1MStart $100200120062011201620212026$570,349$7,251
MNST QCOM

MNST vs QCOM: by the numbers

  • •QCOM is the larger company ($223.15B vs $90.79B market cap).
  • •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 44.85 P/E).
  • •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 22.31% net margin).
  • •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 8.63% CAGR).
  • •QCOM pays a dividend (1.70% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MNST or QCOM?

Metric tally: MNST 8 · QCOM 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMNSTQCOM
P/E ratio44.8522.72●
Forward P/E35.9519.72●
P/S ratio10.435.10●
P/B ratio10.518.32●
PEG ratio1.31●3.96
EV / EBITDA32.3116.71●
FCF yield2.26%5.51%●

Profitability

MetricMNSTQCOM
Gross margin55.47%54.80%
Operating margin29.34%●25.52%
Net margin23.11%●22.31%
ROE23.28%36.38%●
ROIC21.74%●13.15%

Dividends

MetricMNSTQCOM
Dividend yield—1.70%
Payout ratio—70.95%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMNSTQCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)12.96%●8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)7.95%●5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)10.53%●9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.70%●11.87%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MNST or QCOM?
It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 8 to 7.
Is MNST or QCOM cheaper?
On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: MNST trades at a 44.85 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
Which has grown faster, MNST or QCOM?
Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does MNST or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
QCOM pays a dividend (1.70% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Is MNST or QCOM more profitable?
MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
Which has been the better investment, MNST or QCOM?
Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.75% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MNST analysisFull QCOM analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monster Beverage P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEQUALCOMM ROEMonster Beverage operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow

Monster Beverage & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest ROE StocksHighest ROIC StocksHighest FCF Yield StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.