Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMNST +261.3% (+13.7%/yr)QCOM +266.6% (+13.9%/yr)QCOM compounded faster over this window
MNST QCOM
MNST vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($191.07B vs $84.89B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.77 vs 40.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 21.01% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 6.23% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.00 | 20.77 |
| Forward P/E | 37.40 | 17.26 |
| P/S ratio | 9.21 | 4.34 |
| P/B ratio | 9.07 | 6.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.61 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 2.47% | 5.45% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.55% | 54.23% |
| Operating margin | 29.16% | 23.19% |
| Net margin | 23.08% | 21.01% |
| ROE | 22.72% | 33.48% |
| ROIC | 21.32% | 17.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.05% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 41.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.36% | 6.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 2.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.93% | 2.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.44% | 6.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or QCOM?
- QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 40.00 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
- Does MNST or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or QCOM more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
- How have MNST and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.35% and QCOM delivered 14.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioQUALCOMM dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEQUALCOMM ROEMonster Beverage operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Monster Beverage & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.