Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs PACCAR Inc (PCAR)
PCAR leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and PACCAR Inc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
PCAR
PACCAR Inc
$118.52Industrials
Total return — MNST vs PCAR
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +509143.5%PCAR +3592.2%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST PCAR
MNST vs PCAR: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($90.79B vs $62.38B market cap).
- •PCAR trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.22 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 9.09% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 7.01% CAGR).
- •PCAR pays a dividend (2.31% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or PCAR?
Metric tally: MNST 7 · PCAR 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePCAR(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.85 | 25.22● |
| Forward P/E | 35.95 | 20.88● |
| P/S ratio | 10.43 | 2.29● |
| P/B ratio | 10.51 | 3.16● |
| PEG ratio | 1.31● | 2.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.31 | 19.84● |
| FCF yield | 2.26% | 5.23%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47%● | 15.11% |
| Operating margin | 29.34%● | 9.68% |
| Net margin | 23.11%● | 9.09% |
| ROE | 23.28%● | 12.53% |
| ROIC | 21.74%● | 6.39% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.31% |
| Payout ratio | — | 60.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 7.01% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 12.58%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53% | 15.97%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.70% | 16.19%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or PCAR?
- It depends on your goal. value: PCAR (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PCAR leads 9 to 7.
- Is MNST or PCAR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PCAR is cheaper: MNST trades at a 44.85 P/E and PCAR at 25.22.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PCAR?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PCAR at 7.01%.
- Does MNST or PCAR pay a bigger dividend?
- PCAR pays a dividend (2.31% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or PCAR more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PCAR at 9.09%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or PCAR?
- Over the past 10-year, PCAR delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.75% versus PCAR at 14.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPACCAR P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldPACCAR dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPACCAR ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPACCAR operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPACCAR revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPACCAR free cash flow
Monster Beverage & PACCAR appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.