3M Company (MMM) vs Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)
NOC leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of 3M Company and Northrop Grumman Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — MMM vs NOC
growth of $100 · last 30yMMM +456.6%NOC +1576.7%NOC compounded faster
MMM NOC
MMM vs NOC: by the numbers
- •MMM is the larger company ($83.68B vs $77.98B market cap).
- •NOC trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.27 vs 30.91 P/E).
- •MMM converts more revenue to profit (11.14% vs 10.80% net margin).
- •NOC grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.56% vs -5.36% CAGR).
- •MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 1.90%).
Which is better, MMM or NOC?
Metric tally: MMM 7 · NOC 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNOC(lower P/E)
GrowthNOC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMM(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 30.91 | 16.27● |
| Forward P/E | 16.87● | 17.24 |
| P/S ratio | 3.42 | 1.75● |
| P/B ratio | 26.19 | 4.33● |
| PEG ratio | — | 7.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.09 | 14.36● |
| FCF yield | 2.41% | 4.46%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.51%● | 20.52% |
| Operating margin | 19.60%● | 11.08% |
| Net margin | 11.14%● | 10.80% |
| ROE | 85.41%● | 26.74% |
| ROIC | 11.53%● | 9.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.94%● | 1.90% |
| Payout ratio | 51.66% | 33.91% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -5.36% | 2.56%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -8.53% | 8.84%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.95% | -3.15%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.80% | 8.93%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MMM or NOC?
- It depends on your goal. value: NOC (lower P/E); growth: NOC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMM (higher dividend yield); quality: MMM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NOC leads 9 to 7.
- Is MMM or NOC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NOC is cheaper: MMM trades at a 30.91 P/E and NOC at 16.27.
- Which has grown faster, MMM or NOC?
- Over the past five years, NOC grew revenue faster — MMM at a -5.36% CAGR versus NOC at 2.56%.
- Does MMM or NOC pay a bigger dividend?
- MMM yields 1.94% and NOC yields 1.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MMM or NOC more profitable?
- MMM runs the higher net margin — MMM at 11.14% versus NOC at 10.80%.
- Which has been the better investment, MMM or NOC?
- Over the past 10-year, NOC delivered the higher annualized total return — MMM at 4.24% versus NOC at 10.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
3M P/E ratioNorthrop Grumman P/E ratio3M dividend yieldNorthrop Grumman dividend yield3M ROENorthrop Grumman ROE3M operating marginNorthrop Grumman operating margin3M revenue growthNorthrop Grumman revenue growth3M free cash flowNorthrop Grumman free cash flow
3M & Northrop Grumman appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.