Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) vs The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW)
SCHW leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
$90.95Financial Services
Total return — MMC vs SCHW
growth of $100 · last 30yMMC +975.0%SCHW +2778.9%SCHW compounded faster
MMC SCHW
MMC vs SCHW: by the numbers
- •SCHW is the larger company ($161.29B vs $89.82B market cap).
- •SCHW trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.05 vs 20.30 P/E).
- •SCHW converts more revenue to profit (33.26% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •SCHW grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.85% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.30%).
Which is better, MMC or SCHW?
Metric tally: MMC 5 · SCHW 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSCHW(lower P/E)
GrowthSCHW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MMC | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.30 | 18.05● |
| Forward P/E | 16.60 | 12.41● |
| P/S ratio | 3.11● | 5.63 |
| P/B ratio | 5.48 | 3.24● |
| PEG ratio | 7.85 | 0.36● |
Profitability
| Metric | MMC | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.12% | 87.57%● |
| Operating margin | 21.70% | 43.04%● |
| Net margin | 14.26% | 33.26%● |
| ROE | 26.51%● | 19.14% |
| ROIC | 12.12%● | 9.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | MMC | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.10%● | 1.30% |
| Payout ratio | 42.45% | 25.21% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MMC | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.28% | 14.85%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.34% | 17.05%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.12%● | 6.09% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MMC or SCHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: SCHW (lower P/E); growth: SCHW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SCHW leads 9 to 5.
- Is MMC or SCHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SCHW is cheaper: MMC trades at a 20.30 P/E and SCHW at 18.05.
- Which has grown faster, MMC or SCHW?
- Over the past five years, SCHW grew revenue faster — MMC at a 9.28% CAGR versus SCHW at 14.85%.
- Does MMC or SCHW pay a bigger dividend?
- MMC yields 2.10% and SCHW yields 1.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MMC or SCHW more profitable?
- SCHW runs the higher net margin — MMC at 14.26% versus SCHW at 33.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, MMC or SCHW?
- Over the past 10-year, SCHW delivered the higher annualized total return — MMC at 13.86% versus SCHW at 13.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Marsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioCharles Schwab P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldCharles Schwab dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies ROECharles Schwab ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginCharles Schwab operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthCharles Schwab revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flowCharles Schwab free cash flow
Marsh & McLennan Companies & Charles Schwab appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.