McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs AT&T Inc. (T)
T leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and AT&T Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
T
AT&T Inc.
$23.58Communication Services
Total return — MKC vs T
growth of $100 · last 30yMKC +780.4%T +26.6%MKC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MKC T
MKC vs T: by the numbers
- •T is the larger company ($163.84B vs $13.16B market cap).
- •T trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.94 vs 8.02 P/E).
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (23.12% vs 16.89% net margin).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs -6.06% CAGR).
- •T pays the higher dividend yield (4.71% vs 3.80%).
Which is better, MKC or T?
Metric tally: MKC 5 · T 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeT(higher dividend yield)
QualityMKC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | T |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.02 | 7.94 |
| Forward P/E | 14.75 | 9.28● |
| P/S ratio | 1.86 | 1.31● |
| P/B ratio | 1.89 | 1.51● |
| PEG ratio | 8.19 | 0.08● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.63 | 5.88● |
| FCF yield | 6.45% | 10.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | T |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.94% | 79.66%● |
| Operating margin | 15.51% | 19.35%● |
| Net margin | 23.12%● | 16.89% |
| ROE | 23.54%● | 19.48% |
| ROIC | 7.93%● | 5.57% |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | T |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 4.71%● |
| Payout ratio | 63.27% | 36.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | T |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.90%● | -6.06% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | 8.15%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.15%● | -10.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.28% | 7.79%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or T?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: T (higher dividend yield); quality: MKC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, T leads 11 to 5.
- Is MKC or T cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, T is cheaper: MKC trades at a 8.02 P/E and T at 7.94.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or T?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 3.90% CAGR versus T at -6.06%.
- Does MKC or T pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 3.80% and T yields 4.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or T more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 23.12% versus T at 16.89%.
- Which has been the better investment, MKC or T?
- Over the past 10-year, T delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.73% versus T at 4.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioAT&T P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldAT&T dividend yieldMcCormick & ROEAT&T ROEMcCormick & operating marginAT&T operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthAT&T revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowAT&T free cash flow
McCormick & & AT&T appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.