McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
MKC leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — MKC vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yMKC +790.0%STZ +3669.3%STZ compounded faster
MKC STZ
MKC vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $13.16B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.02 vs 15.49 P/E).
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (23.12% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •MKC pays the higher dividend yield (3.80% vs 2.75%).
Which is better, MKC or STZ?
Metric tally: MKC 9 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMKC(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.02● | 15.49 |
| Forward P/E | 14.76 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 1.86● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 1.89● | 3.19 |
| PEG ratio | 8.19 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.96 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 6.21% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.94% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 15.51% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 23.12%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 23.54%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 7.93% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.80%● | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | 63.27% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.90%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.35%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.28% | -7.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MKC (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MKC leads 9 to 7.
- Is MKC or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: MKC trades at a 8.02 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or STZ?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 3.90% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does MKC or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 3.80% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or STZ more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 23.12% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, MKC or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.73% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldMcCormick & ROEConstellation Brands ROEMcCormick & operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
McCormick & & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.