McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

MKC leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total return — MKC vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 30y
MKC +790.0%STZ +3669.3%STZ compounded faster
02k4k6kStart $100200120062011201620212026$890$3,769
MKC STZ

MKC vs STZ: by the numbers

  • STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $13.16B market cap).
  • MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.02 vs 15.49 P/E).
  • MKC converts more revenue to profit (23.12% vs 18.46% net margin).
  • MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs 1.19% CAGR).
  • MKC pays the higher dividend yield (3.80% vs 2.75%).

Which is better, MKC or STZ?

Metric tally: MKC 9 · STZ 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMKC(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMKCSTZ
P/E ratio8.0215.49
Forward P/E14.7611.90
P/S ratio1.862.82
P/B ratio1.893.19
PEG ratio8.19
EV / EBITDA13.9611.70
FCF yield6.21%6.95%

Profitability

MetricMKCSTZ
Gross margin37.94%51.67%
Operating margin15.51%31.33%
Net margin23.12%18.46%
ROE23.54%20.87%
ROIC7.93%10.48%

Dividends

MetricMKCSTZ
Dividend yield3.80%2.75%
Payout ratio63.27%42.52%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMKCSTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)3.90%1.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)0.98%-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)2.35%-1.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-9.28%-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MKC or STZ?
It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MKC (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MKC leads 9 to 7.
Is MKC or STZ cheaper?
On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: MKC trades at a 8.02 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, MKC or STZ?
Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 3.90% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does MKC or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
MKC yields 3.80% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MKC or STZ more profitable?
MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 23.12% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, MKC or STZ?
Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.73% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.