McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$56.48Consumer DefensiveAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$133.52Consumer DefensiveAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — MKC vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMKC +35.7% (+3.1%/yr)STZ -5.2% (-0.5%/yr)MKC compounded faster over this window
MKC STZ
MKC vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($22.81B vs $15.18B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.40 vs 12.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (22.05% vs 20.14% net margin).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.15% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •MKC pays the higher dividend yield (3.35% vs 3.07%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.40 | 12.74 |
| Forward P/E | 18.30 | 11.47 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06 | 2.54 |
| P/B ratio | 2.17 | 2.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.25 | 10.07 |
| FCF yield | 7.62% | 7.97% |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.62% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 15.34% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 22.05% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 6.16% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.35% | 3.07% |
| Payout ratio | 64.29% | 42.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.15% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.93% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.26% | -7.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MKC or STZ?
- MKC has the lower trailing P/E: MKC trades at 9.40 and STZ at 12.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or STZ?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — MKC at a 4.15% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does MKC or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC yields 3.35% and STZ yields 3.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MKC or STZ more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — MKC at 22.05% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have MKC and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MKC delivered 3.05% and STZ delivered -0.53% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioMcCormick dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldMcCormick ROEConstellation Brands ROEMcCormick operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginMcCormick revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthMcCormick free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
McCormick & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.