McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)
RMBS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though MKC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
$146.56Technology
Total return — MKC vs RMBS
growth of $100 · last 29yMKC +667.2%RMBS +1838.0%RMBS compounded faster
MKC RMBS
MKC vs RMBS: by the numbers
- •RMBS is the larger company ($15.85B vs $13.16B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.02 vs 69.79 P/E).
- •RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.89% vs 23.12% net margin).
- •RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.51% vs 3.90% CAGR).
- •MKC pays a dividend (3.80% yield) while RMBS does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MKC or RMBS?
Metric tally: MKC 7 · RMBS 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthRMBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityRMBS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MKC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.02● | 69.79 |
| Forward P/E | 14.76● | 49.34 |
| P/S ratio | 1.86● | 22.30 |
| P/B ratio | 1.89● | 11.54 |
| PEG ratio | 8.19 | 1.53● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.96● | 52.03 |
| FCF yield | 6.21%● | 2.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | MKC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.94% | 77.03%● |
| Operating margin | 15.51% | 35.89%● |
| Net margin | 23.12% | 31.89%● |
| ROE | 23.54%● | 16.51% |
| ROIC | 7.93% | 15.03%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MKC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | — |
| Payout ratio | 63.27% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MKC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.90% | 23.51%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | 48.76%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.35% | 16.48%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.28% | 49.06%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MKC or RMBS?
- It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: RMBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RMBS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RMBS leads 9 to 7.
- Is MKC or RMBS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: MKC trades at a 8.02 P/E and RMBS at 69.79.
- Which has grown faster, MKC or RMBS?
- Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — MKC at a 3.90% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.
- Does MKC or RMBS pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC pays a dividend (3.80% yield) while RMBS does not currently pay one.
- Is MKC or RMBS more profitable?
- RMBS runs the higher net margin — MKC at 23.12% versus RMBS at 31.89%.
- Which has been the better investment, MKC or RMBS?
- Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — MKC at 1.73% versus RMBS at 28.27%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
McCormick & P/E ratioRambus P/E ratioMcCormick & dividend yieldRambus dividend yieldMcCormick & ROERambus ROEMcCormick & operating marginRambus operating marginMcCormick & revenue growthRambus revenue growthMcCormick & free cash flowRambus free cash flow
McCormick & & Rambus appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.