Which has grown faster, MHK or TAP?

Over the past five years, TAP grew revenue faster — MHK at a 2.03% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.

Does MHK or TAP pay a bigger dividend?

TAP pays a dividend (4.57% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.

Is MHK or TAP more profitable?

MHK runs the higher net margin — MHK at 3.77% versus TAP at -18.85%.

Which has been the better investment, MHK or TAP?

Over the past 10-year, MHK delivered the higher annualized total return — MHK at -5.78% versus TAP at -6.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)

TAP leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$6.56B

$107.64Consumer Cyclical

TAP

Molson Coors Beverage Company

$7.80B

$41.58Consumer Defensive

Total return — MHK vs TAP

growth of $100 · last 30y

MHK +816.1%TAP +368.2%MHK compounded faster

MHK TAP

MHK vs TAP: by the numbers

•TAP is the larger company ($7.80B vs $6.56B market cap).
•MHK is profitable (3.77% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
•TAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.44% vs 2.03% CAGR).
•TAP pays a dividend (4.57% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MHK or TAP?

Metric tally: MHK 5 · TAP 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthTAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMHK(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	MHK	TAP
P/E ratio	16.14	—
Forward P/E	12.54	8.37●
P/S ratio	0.60●	0.70
P/B ratio	0.79	0.78
EV / EBITDA	5.54	—
FCF yield	10.68%	14.81%●

Profitability

Metric	MHK	TAP
Gross margin	24.34%	37.83%●
Operating margin	4.89%●	-20.28%
Net margin	3.77%●	-18.85%
ROE	4.95%●	-20.98%
ROIC	3.54%●	-10.20%

Dividends

Metric	MHK	TAP
Dividend yield	—	4.57%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MHK	TAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.03%	3.44%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.82%	36.85%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-12.83%	1.73%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-11.03%	-4.04%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MHK or TAP?: It depends on your goal. growth: TAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MHK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TAP leads 7 to 5.
Which has grown faster, MHK or TAP?: Over the past five years, TAP grew revenue faster — MHK at a 2.03% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
Does MHK or TAP pay a bigger dividend?: TAP pays a dividend (4.57% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.
Is MHK or TAP more profitable?: MHK runs the higher net margin — MHK at 3.77% versus TAP at -18.85%.
Which has been the better investment, MHK or TAP?: Over the past 10-year, MHK delivered the higher annualized total return — MHK at -5.78% versus TAP at -6.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MHK analysis Full TAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Molson Coors Beverage P/E ratio Mohawk Industries dividend yield Molson Coors Beverage dividend yield Mohawk Industries ROE Molson Coors Beverage ROE Mohawk Industries operating margin Molson Coors Beverage operating margin Mohawk Industries revenue growth Molson Coors Beverage revenue growth Mohawk Industries free cash flow Molson Coors Beverage free cash flow

Mohawk Industries & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.