Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though MHK is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
$113.27Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — MHK vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yMHK +36.2%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MHK SIMO
MHK vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $6.90B market cap).
- •MHK trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.98 vs 21.10 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 3.77% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 2.03% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MHK or SIMO?
Metric tally: MHK 7 · SIMO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMHK(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MHK | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.98● | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 13.19● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.64● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 0.83● | 2.74 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.07● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 10.15%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | MHK | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.34% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 4.89% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 3.77% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 4.95% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 3.54% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MHK | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MHK | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.03% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.82% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -12.83%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.00% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MHK or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: MHK (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 8 to 7.
- Is MHK or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MHK is cheaper: MHK trades at a 16.98 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, MHK or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — MHK at a 2.03% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does MHK or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.
- Is MHK or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — MHK at 3.77% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, MHK or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — MHK at -5.67% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mohawk Industries P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioMohawk Industries dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldMohawk Industries ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEMohawk Industries operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginMohawk Industries revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthMohawk Industries free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Mohawk Industries & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.