Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) vs Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN)
MTN leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though MHK is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 22, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
$110.41Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
$144.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MHK vs MTN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29yMHK +532.3%MTN +872.5%MTN compounded faster
MHK MTN
MHK vs MTN: by the numbers
- •MHK is the larger company ($6.73B vs $5.16B market cap).
- •MHK trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.23 vs 34.04 P/E).
- •MTN converts more revenue to profit (6.29% vs 3.77% net margin).
- •MTN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.70% vs 2.03% CAGR).
- •MTN pays a dividend (6.02% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MHK or MTN?
Metric tally: MHK 6 · MTN 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMHK(lower P/E)
GrowthMTN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMTN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MHK | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.23● | 34.04 |
| Forward P/E | 12.61● | 34.07 |
| P/S ratio | 0.61● | 1.87 |
| P/B ratio | 0.80● | 9.59 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.82● | 8.30 |
| FCF yield | 10.62%● | 4.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | MHK | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.34% | 42.78%● |
| Operating margin | 4.89% | 24.13%● |
| Net margin | 3.77% | 6.29%● |
| ROE | 4.95% | 32.27%● |
| ROIC | 3.54% | 8.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MHK | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 6.02% |
| Payout ratio | — | 117.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MHK | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.03% | 9.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.82% | 25.21%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -12.83% | 7.51%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.88% | -10.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MHK or MTN?
- It depends on your goal. value: MHK (lower P/E); growth: MTN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MTN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTN leads 9 to 6.
- Is MHK or MTN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MHK is cheaper: MHK trades at a 16.23 P/E and MTN at 34.04.
- Which has grown faster, MHK or MTN?
- Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — MHK at a 2.03% CAGR versus MTN at 9.70%.
- Does MHK or MTN pay a bigger dividend?
- MTN pays a dividend (6.02% yield) while MHK does not currently pay one.
- Is MHK or MTN more profitable?
- MTN runs the higher net margin — MHK at 3.77% versus MTN at 6.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, MHK or MTN?
- Over the past 10-year, MTN delivered the higher annualized total return — MHK at -5.90% versus MTN at 3.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mohawk Industries P/E ratioVail Resorts P/E ratioMohawk Industries dividend yieldVail Resorts dividend yieldMohawk Industries ROEVail Resorts ROEMohawk Industries operating marginVail Resorts operating marginMohawk Industries revenue growthVail Resorts revenue growthMohawk Industries free cash flowVail Resorts free cash flow
Mohawk Industries & Vail Resorts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 22, 2026.