MetLife, Inc. (MET) vs The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV)
TRV leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of MetLife, Inc. and The Travelers Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$88.84Financial Services
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
$304.46Financial Services
Total return — MET vs TRV
growth of $100 · last 26yMET +576.1%TRV +831.4%TRV compounded faster
MET TRV
MET vs TRV: by the numbers
- •TRV is the larger company ($64.74B vs $57.16B market cap).
- •TRV trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.06 vs 17.22 P/E).
- •TRV converts more revenue to profit (15.54% vs 4.70% net margin).
- •TRV grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.61% vs 3.40% CAGR).
- •MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.58% vs 1.49%).
Which is better, MET or TRV?
Metric tally: MET 4 · TRV 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRV(lower P/E)
GrowthTRV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMET(higher dividend yield)
QualityTRV(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MET | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.22 | 9.06● |
| Forward P/E | 8.96● | 10.85 |
| P/S ratio | 0.76● | 1.36 |
| P/B ratio | 2.13 | 2.08● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.50 | 7.11● |
| FCF yield | 28.41%● | 17.21% |
Profitability
| Metric | MET | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.40% | 44.02%● |
| Operating margin | 6.26% | 19.30%● |
| Net margin | 4.70% | 15.54%● |
| ROE | 13.24% | 23.77%● |
| ROIC | 0.72% | 12.10%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MET | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.58%● | 1.49% |
| Payout ratio | 47.81% | 16.34% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MET | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.40% | 8.61%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.45% | 21.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.18% | 10.08%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.03% | 16.77%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MET or TRV?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRV (lower P/E); growth: TRV (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MET (higher dividend yield); quality: TRV (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRV leads 12 to 4.
- Is MET or TRV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRV is cheaper: MET trades at a 17.22 P/E and TRV at 9.06.
- Which has grown faster, MET or TRV?
- Over the past five years, TRV grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus TRV at 8.61%.
- Does MET or TRV pay a bigger dividend?
- MET yields 2.58% and TRV yields 1.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MET or TRV more profitable?
- TRV runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus TRV at 15.54%.
- Which has been the better investment, MET or TRV?
- Over the past 10-year, TRV delivered the higher annualized total return — MET at 12.46% versus TRV at 12.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
MetLife P/E ratioTravelers Companies P/E ratioMetLife dividend yieldTravelers Companies dividend yieldMetLife ROETravelers Companies ROEMetLife operating marginTravelers Companies operating marginMetLife revenue growthTravelers Companies revenue growthMetLife free cash flowTravelers Companies free cash flow
MetLife & Travelers Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.