MetLife, Inc. (MET) vs MSCI Inc. (MSCI)
MET and MSCI are evenly matched — 6 metrics each of 12.
A side-by-side comparison of MetLife, Inc. and MSCI Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — MET vs MSCI
growth of $100 · last 19yMET +53.8%MSCI +2299.4%MSCI compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MET MSCI
MET vs MSCI: by the numbers
- •MET is the larger company ($57.16B vs $43.62B market cap).
- •MET trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.22 vs 34.49 P/E).
- •MSCI converts more revenue to profit (40.74% vs 4.70% net margin).
- •MSCI grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.02% vs 3.40% CAGR).
- •MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.58% vs 1.29%).
Which is better, MET or MSCI?
Metric tally: MET 6 · MSCI 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMET(lower P/E)
GrowthMSCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMET(higher dividend yield)
QualityMSCI(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MET | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.22● | 34.49 |
| Forward P/E | 8.96● | 26.61 |
| P/S ratio | 0.76● | 13.58 |
| P/B ratio | 2.13 | — |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.48 |
Profitability
| Metric | MET | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.40% | 82.86%● |
| Operating margin | 6.26% | 55.36%● |
| Net margin | 4.70% | 40.74%● |
| ROE | 13.24%● | -45.29% |
| ROIC | 0.72% | 35.60%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MET | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.58%● | 1.29% |
| Payout ratio | 47.81% | 49.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MET | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.40% | 13.02%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.45% | 16.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.03%● | 5.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MET or MSCI?
- It depends on your goal. value: MET (lower P/E); growth: MSCI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MET (higher dividend yield); quality: MSCI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is MET or MSCI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MET is cheaper: MET trades at a 17.22 P/E and MSCI at 34.49.
- Which has grown faster, MET or MSCI?
- Over the past five years, MSCI grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus MSCI at 13.02%.
- Does MET or MSCI pay a bigger dividend?
- MET yields 2.58% and MSCI yields 1.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MET or MSCI more profitable?
- MSCI runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus MSCI at 40.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, MET or MSCI?
- Over the past 10-year, MSCI delivered the higher annualized total return — MET at 12.46% versus MSCI at 24.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
MetLife P/E ratioMSCI P/E ratioMetLife dividend yieldMSCI dividend yieldMetLife ROEMSCI ROEMetLife operating marginMSCI operating marginMetLife revenue growthMSCI revenue growthMetLife free cash flowMSCI free cash flow
MetLife & MSCI appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.