Which has grown faster, ME or WBA?

Over the past five years, WBA grew revenue faster — ME at a -9.07% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.

Which has been the better investment, ME or WBA?

Over the past 5-year, WBA delivered the higher annualized total return — ME at -68.93% versus WBA at -14.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

23andMe Holding Co. (ME) vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA)

WBA leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of 23andMe Holding Co. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

$10.37B

$11.98Healthcare

Total return — ME vs WBA

growth of $100 · last 5y

ME -97.5%WBA -68.5%WBA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ME WBA

ME vs WBA: by the numbers

•WBA is the larger company ($10.37B vs $15M market cap).
•Both run net losses; WBA's is the smaller (-4.07% vs -134.54% net margin).
•WBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.53% vs -9.07% CAGR).

Which is better, ME or WBA?

Metric tally: ME 2 · WBA 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWBA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityWBA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ME	WBA
Forward P/E	—	7.65
P/S ratio	0.10	0.07●
P/B ratio	0.51●	1.44
FCF yield	—	5.60%

Profitability

Metric	ME	WBA
Gross margin	53.33%●	17.13%
Operating margin	-114.00%	-2.02%●
Net margin	-134.54%	-4.07%●
ROE	-721.75%	-87.68%●
ROIC	-553.10%	-24.28%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ME	WBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-9.07%	3.53%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	5.73%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	-33.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-68.93%	-16.99%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ME or WBA?: It depends on your goal. growth: WBA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WBA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WBA leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, ME or WBA?: Over the past five years, WBA grew revenue faster — ME at a -9.07% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.
Which has been the better investment, ME or WBA?: Over the past 5-year, WBA delivered the higher annualized total return — ME at -68.93% versus WBA at -14.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ME analysis Full WBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

23andMe P/E ratio Walgreens Boots Alliance P/E ratio 23andMe dividend yield Walgreens Boots Alliance dividend yield 23andMe ROE Walgreens Boots Alliance ROE 23andMe operating margin Walgreens Boots Alliance operating margin 23andMe revenue growth Walgreens Boots Alliance revenue growth 23andMe free cash flow Walgreens Boots Alliance free cash flow

23andMe & Walgreens Boots Alliance appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.