Medtronic plc (MDT) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though MDT is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Medtronic plc and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MDT
Medtronic plc
$80.20Healthcare
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Total return — MDT vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 30yMDT +462.8%MNST +509143.5%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MDT MNST
MDT vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MDT is the larger company ($102.97B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •MDT trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.50 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 13.20% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 5.18% CAGR).
- •MDT pays a dividend (3.54% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MDT or MNST?
Metric tally: MDT 7 · MNST 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMDT(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MDT | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.50● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 12.56● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 2.84● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 2.11● | 10.51 |
| PEG ratio | 6.73 | 1.31● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.03● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 5.25%● | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | MDT | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 65.02%● | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 17.78% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 13.20% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 9.80% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 0.00% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MDT | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.54% | — |
| Payout ratio | 75.73% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MDT | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.18% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.83% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.07% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.47% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MDT or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: MDT (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 7.
- Is MDT or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MDT is cheaper: MDT trades at a 21.50 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, MDT or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MDT at a 5.18% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does MDT or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- MDT pays a dividend (3.54% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MDT or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MDT at 13.20% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, MDT or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MDT at 1.97% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Medtronic P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioMedtronic dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldMedtronic ROEMonster Beverage ROEMedtronic operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginMedtronic revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthMedtronic free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Medtronic & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.