Moody's Corporation (MCO) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
MMC leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Moody's Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MCO
Moody's Corporation
$447.85Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — MCO vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 30yMCO +4995.6%MMC +975.0%MCO compounded faster
MCO MMC
MCO vs MMC: by the numbers
- •MMC is the larger company ($89.82B vs $78.24B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 32.13 P/E).
- •MCO converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •MMC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 6.74% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 0.88%).
Which is better, MCO or MMC?
Metric tally: MCO 6 · MMC 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMC(lower P/E)
GrowthMMC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMCO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MCO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.13 | 20.30● |
| Forward P/E | 24.02 | 16.60● |
| P/S ratio | 10.09 | 3.11● |
| P/B ratio | 26.52 | 5.48● |
| PEG ratio | 1.75● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | MCO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 69.69%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 44.16%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 31.69%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 83.33%● | 26.51% |
| ROIC | 21.00%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | MCO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.70% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MCO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.74% | 9.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.69% | 16.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.26% | 10.12%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MCO or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMC (lower P/E); growth: MMC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MCO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MMC leads 8 to 6.
- Is MCO or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: MCO trades at a 32.13 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, MCO or MMC?
- Over the past five years, MMC grew revenue faster — MCO at a 6.74% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does MCO or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- MCO yields 0.88% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MCO or MMC more profitable?
- MCO runs the higher net margin — MCO at 31.69% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, MCO or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, MCO delivered the higher annualized total return — MCO at 17.34% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Moody's P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioMoody's dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldMoody's ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEMoody's operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginMoody's revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthMoody's free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Moody's & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.