Is MAS or TXT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TXT is cheaper: MAS trades at a 19.52 P/E and TXT at 17.49.

Which has grown faster, MAS or TXT?

Over the past five years, TXT grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus TXT at 5.26%.

Does MAS or TXT pay a bigger dividend?

MAS yields 1.60% and TXT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MAS or TXT more profitable?

MAS runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus TXT at 6.15%.

Which has been the better investment, MAS or TXT?

Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — MAS at 10.39% versus TXT at 9.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Masco Corporation (MAS) vs Textron Inc. (TXT)

TXT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Masco Corporation and Textron Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MAS

Masco Corporation

$15.87B

$78.65IndustrialsAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

TXT

Textron Inc.

$15.91B

$91.48IndustrialsAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — MAS vs TXT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

MAS +1063.6%TXT +529.0%MAS compounded faster

MAS TXT

MAS vs TXT: by the numbers

•TXT is the larger company ($15.91B vs $15.87B market cap).
•TXT trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.49 vs 19.52 P/E).
•MAS converts more revenue to profit (10.90% vs 6.15% net margin).
•TXT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.26% vs 0.27% CAGR).
•MAS pays the higher dividend yield (1.60% vs 0.09%).

Which is better, MAS or TXT?

Metric tally: MAS 7 · TXT 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTXT(lower P/E)

GrowthTXT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMAS(higher dividend yield)

QualityMAS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MAS	TXT
P/E ratio	19.52	17.49●
Forward P/E	18.39	14.94●
P/S ratio	2.08	1.06●
P/B ratio	—	2.01
PEG ratio	5.61	1.02●
EV / EBITDA	13.10	11.03●
FCF yield	5.91%●	4.39%

Profitability

Metric	MAS	TXT
Gross margin	35.41%●	14.41%
Operating margin	16.79%●	8.37%
Net margin	10.90%●	6.15%
ROE	-435.48%	11.67%●
ROIC	26.15%●	7.33%

Dividends

Metric	MAS	TXT
Dividend yield	1.60%●	0.09%
Payout ratio	32.47%	1.57%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MAS	TXT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.27%	5.26%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.07%	30.49%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.44%	6.96%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.85%●	6.76%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MAS or TXT?: It depends on your goal. value: TXT (lower P/E); growth: TXT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MAS (higher dividend yield); quality: MAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TXT leads 9 to 7.
Is MAS or TXT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TXT is cheaper: MAS trades at a 19.52 P/E and TXT at 17.49.
Which has grown faster, MAS or TXT?: Over the past five years, TXT grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus TXT at 5.26%.
Does MAS or TXT pay a bigger dividend?: MAS yields 1.60% and TXT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MAS or TXT more profitable?: MAS runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus TXT at 6.15%.
Which has been the better investment, MAS or TXT?: Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — MAS at 10.39% versus TXT at 9.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MAS analysis Full TXT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Masco P/E ratio Textron P/E ratio Masco dividend yield Textron dividend yield Masco ROE Textron ROE Masco operating margin Textron operating margin Masco revenue growth Textron revenue growth Masco free cash flow Textron free cash flow

Masco & Textron appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 18, 2026.