Masco Corporation (MAS) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
MAS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Masco Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MAS
Masco Corporation
$77.51IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$87.50IndustrialsAt close: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — MAS vs SWK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yMAS +1047.3%SWK +529.3%MAS compounded faster
MAS SWK
MAS vs SWK: by the numbers
- •MAS is the larger company ($15.64B vs $13.60B market cap).
- •MAS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.52 vs 35.86 P/E).
- •MAS converts more revenue to profit (10.90% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •MAS grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.27% vs -0.19% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 1.60%).
Which is better, MAS or SWK?
Metric tally: MAS 10 · SWK 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMAS(lower P/E)
GrowthMAS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)
QualityMAS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MAS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.52● | 35.86 |
| Forward P/E | 18.37● | 19.25 |
| P/S ratio | 2.08 | 0.88● |
| P/B ratio | — | 1.49 |
| PEG ratio | 5.61 | 0.82● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.10 | 11.78● |
| FCF yield | 5.91%● | 5.44% |
Profitability
| Metric | MAS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.41%● | 30.03% |
| Operating margin | 16.79%● | 7.79% |
| Net margin | 10.90%● | 2.44% |
| ROE | -435.48% | 4.13%● |
| ROIC | 26.15%● | 6.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | MAS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 3.79%● |
| Payout ratio | 32.47% | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MAS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.27%● | -0.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.07%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.44% | 47.72%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.55%● | -12.49% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MAS or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: MAS (lower P/E); growth: MAS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: MAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MAS leads 10 to 6.
- Is MAS or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MAS is cheaper: MAS trades at a 19.52 P/E and SWK at 35.86.
- Which has grown faster, MAS or SWK?
- Over the past five years, MAS grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus SWK at -0.19%.
- Does MAS or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- MAS yields 1.60% and SWK yields 3.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MAS or SWK more profitable?
- MAS runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, MAS or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — MAS at 10.16% versus SWK at -0.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Masco P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioMasco dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldMasco ROEStanley Black & Decker ROEMasco operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginMasco revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthMasco free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
Masco & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.