Which has grown faster, MAS or STLA?

Over the past five years, STLA grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus STLA at 14.82%.

Does MAS or STLA pay a bigger dividend?

MAS yields 1.60% and STLA yields 13.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MAS or STLA more profitable?

MAS runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus STLA at -0.69%.

Which has been the better investment, MAS or STLA?

Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — MAS at 11.92% versus STLA at 6.13%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Masco Corporation (MAS) vs Stellantis N.V. (STLA)

MAS leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Masco Corporation and Stellantis N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MAS

Masco Corporation

$16.11B

$79.97Consumer Cyclical

STLA

Stellantis N.V.

$16.46B

$5.68Consumer Cyclical

Total return — MAS vs STLA

growth of $100 · last 23y

MAS +289.1%STLA +240.1%MAS compounded faster

MAS STLA

MAS vs STLA: by the numbers

•STLA is the larger company ($16.46B vs $16.11B market cap).
•MAS is profitable (10.90% net margin) while STLA runs a net loss (-0.69%).
•STLA grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.82% vs 0.27% CAGR).
•STLA pays the higher dividend yield (13.59% vs 1.60%).

Which is better, MAS or STLA?

Metric tally: MAS 7 · STLA 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSTLA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSTLA(higher dividend yield)

QualityMAS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MAS	STLA
P/E ratio	19.84	—
Forward P/E	18.70	4.19●
P/S ratio	2.11	0.08●
P/B ratio	—	0.23
PEG ratio	5.61	—
EV / EBITDA	13.29	5.48●
FCF yield	5.81%	—

Profitability

Metric	MAS	STLA
Gross margin	35.41%●	-1.38%
Operating margin	16.79%●	-14.48%
Net margin	10.90%●	-0.69%
ROE	-435.48%	-2.05%●
ROIC	26.15%●	-14.30%

Dividends

Metric	MAS	STLA
Dividend yield	1.60%	13.59%●
Payout ratio	32.99%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MAS	STLA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.27%	14.82%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.07%●	-0.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.44%●	-46.87%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.64%●	-17.58%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MAS or STLA?: It depends on your goal. growth: STLA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STLA (higher dividend yield); quality: MAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MAS leads 7 to 6.
Which has grown faster, MAS or STLA?: Over the past five years, STLA grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus STLA at 14.82%.
Does MAS or STLA pay a bigger dividend?: MAS yields 1.60% and STLA yields 13.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MAS or STLA more profitable?: MAS runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus STLA at -0.69%.
Which has been the better investment, MAS or STLA?: Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — MAS at 11.92% versus STLA at 6.13%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MAS analysis Full STLA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Masco P/E ratio Stellantis P/E ratio Masco dividend yield Stellantis dividend yield Masco ROE Stellantis ROE Masco operating margin Stellantis operating margin Masco revenue growth Stellantis revenue growth Masco free cash flow Stellantis free cash flow

Masco & Stellantis appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.