Masco Corporation (MAS) vs RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC)
RBC leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though MAS is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Masco Corporation and RBC Bearings Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MAS
Masco Corporation
$77.51IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
$568.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MAS vs RBC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yMAS +335.0%RBC +1826.5%RBC compounded faster
MAS RBC
MAS vs RBC: by the numbers
- •RBC is the larger company ($18.00B vs $15.64B market cap).
- •MAS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.52 vs 62.59 P/E).
- •RBC converts more revenue to profit (15.37% vs 10.90% net margin).
- •RBC grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.93% vs 0.27% CAGR).
- •MAS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MAS or RBC?
Metric tally: MAS 6 · RBC 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMAS(lower P/E)
GrowthRBC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMAS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MAS | RBC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.52● | 62.59 |
| Forward P/E | 18.37● | 46.73 |
| P/S ratio | 2.08● | 9.64 |
| P/B ratio | — | 5.37 |
| PEG ratio | 5.61 | 3.27● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.10● | 34.72 |
| FCF yield | 5.91%● | 1.90% |
Profitability
| Metric | MAS | RBC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.41% | 44.37%● |
| Operating margin | 16.79% | 22.50%● |
| Net margin | 10.90% | 15.37%● |
| ROE | -435.48% | 8.56%● |
| ROIC | 26.15%● | 6.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | MAS | RBC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | — |
| Payout ratio | 32.47% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MAS | RBC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.27% | 22.93%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.07% | 10.16%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.44% | 19.21%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.55% | 34.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MAS or RBC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MAS (lower P/E); growth: RBC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RBC leads 9 to 6.
- Is MAS or RBC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MAS is cheaper: MAS trades at a 19.52 P/E and RBC at 62.59.
- Which has grown faster, MAS or RBC?
- Over the past five years, RBC grew revenue faster — MAS at a 0.27% CAGR versus RBC at 22.93%.
- Does MAS or RBC pay a bigger dividend?
- MAS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.
- Is MAS or RBC more profitable?
- RBC runs the higher net margin — MAS at 10.90% versus RBC at 15.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, MAS or RBC?
- Over the past 10-year, RBC delivered the higher annualized total return — MAS at 10.16% versus RBC at 25.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Masco P/E ratioRBC Bearings P/E ratioMasco dividend yieldRBC Bearings dividend yieldMasco ROERBC Bearings ROEMasco operating marginRBC Bearings operating marginMasco revenue growthRBC Bearings revenue growthMasco free cash flowRBC Bearings free cash flow
Masco & RBC Bearings appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.