Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$49.58Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — LW vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yLW +70.1%SIMO +643.9%SIMO compounded faster
LW SIMO
LW vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $6.85B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 23.84 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 4.39% net margin).
- •LW pays the higher dividend yield (3.03% vs 0.74%).
Which is better, LW or SIMO?
Metric tally: LW 6 · SIMO 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
IncomeLW(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LW | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.84 | 21.10● |
| Forward P/E | 17.89● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 1.03● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 3.75 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | 2.18 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.93● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 9.22%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | LW | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.56% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 8.94% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 4.39% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 15.89% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 6.44% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LW | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.03%● | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | 71.77% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LW | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.49% | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.92% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.01%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.31% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LW or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); income: LW (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 10 to 6.
- Is LW or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: LW trades at a 23.84 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, LW or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — LW at a 12.49% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does LW or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- LW yields 3.03% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LW or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — LW at 4.39% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, LW or SIMO?
- Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — LW at -6.31% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lamb Weston P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioLamb Weston dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldLamb Weston ROESilicon Motion Technology ROELamb Weston operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginLamb Weston revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthLamb Weston free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Lamb Weston & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.