Is LULU or WYNN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.62 P/E and WYNN at 30.74.

Which has grown faster, LULU or WYNN?

Over the past five years, WYNN grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus WYNN at 31.17%.

Does LULU or WYNN pay a bigger dividend?

WYNN pays a dividend (0.93% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Is LULU or WYNN more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus WYNN at 5.14%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or WYNN?

Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus WYNN at 1.89%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN)

LULU leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Wynn Resorts, Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

WYNN

Wynn Resorts, Limited

$11.13B

$107.27Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs WYNN

growth of $100 · last 19y

LULU +692.1%WYNN +8.1%LULU compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LULU WYNN

LULU vs WYNN: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.49B vs $11.13B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.62 vs 30.74 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 5.14% net margin).
•WYNN grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.17% vs 17.61% CAGR).
•WYNN pays a dividend (0.93% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LULU or WYNN?

Metric tally: LULU 12 · WYNN 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthWYNN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LULU	WYNN
P/E ratio	9.62●	30.74
Forward P/E	10.71●	22.94
P/S ratio	1.22●	1.53
P/B ratio	2.84	—
PEG ratio	0.40●	23.29
EV / EBITDA	5.81●	12.09
FCF yield	9.33%●	6.22%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	WYNN
Gross margin	55.70%●	38.72%
Operating margin	18.21%●	15.89%
Net margin	13.03%●	5.14%
ROE	30.25%●	-118.82%
ROIC	22.70%●	7.73%

Dividends

Metric	LULU	WYNN
Dividend yield	—	0.93%
Payout ratio	—	31.65%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	WYNN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	31.17%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%●	1.32%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%	83.49%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.88%	-2.70%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or WYNN?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: WYNN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 12 to 3.
Is LULU or WYNN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.62 P/E and WYNN at 30.74.
Which has grown faster, LULU or WYNN?: Over the past five years, WYNN grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus WYNN at 31.17%.
Does LULU or WYNN pay a bigger dividend?: WYNN pays a dividend (0.93% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Is LULU or WYNN more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus WYNN at 5.14%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or WYNN?: Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus WYNN at 1.89%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full WYNN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Wynn Resorts P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Wynn Resorts dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Wynn Resorts ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Wynn Resorts operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Wynn Resorts revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Wynn Resorts free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Wynn Resorts appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.