Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs WESCO International, Inc. (WCC)
LULU leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and WESCO International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$114.28Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
WCC
WESCO International, Inc.
$332.48IndustrialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — LULU vs WCC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19yLULU +716.3%WCC +460.7%LULU compounded faster
LULU WCC
LULU vs WCC: by the numbers
- •WCC is the larger company ($16.19B vs $12.98B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.25 vs 23.63 P/E).
- •LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 2.79% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 10.99% CAGR).
- •WCC pays a dividend (0.57% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Which is better, LULU or WCC?
Metric tally: LULU 13 · WCC 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLULU(lower P/E)
GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLULU(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LULU | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.25● | 23.63 |
| Forward P/E | 8.76● | 20.67 |
| P/S ratio | 1.18 | 0.68● |
| P/B ratio | 2.73● | 3.23 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39● | 0.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.40● | 14.55 |
| FCF yield | 9.70%● | 1.31% |
Profitability
| Metric | LULU | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.70%● | 20.26% |
| Operating margin | 18.21%● | 5.39% |
| Net margin | 13.03%● | 2.79% |
| ROE | 30.25%● | 13.25% |
| ROIC | 22.70%● | 7.45% |
Dividends
| Metric | LULU | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.57% |
| Payout ratio | — | 14.39% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LULU | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.61%● | 10.99% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.02% | 54.03%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.88%● | -18.01% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -22.26% | 27.54%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LULU or WCC?
- It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 13 to 3.
- Is LULU or WCC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.25 P/E and WCC at 23.63.
- Which has grown faster, LULU or WCC?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus WCC at 10.99%.
- Does LULU or WCC pay a bigger dividend?
- WCC pays a dividend (0.57% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
- Is LULU or WCC more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus WCC at 2.79%.
- Which has been the better investment, LULU or WCC?
- Over the past 10-year, WCC delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 4.14% versus WCC at 20.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lululemon Athletica P/E ratioWESCO International P/E ratioLululemon Athletica dividend yieldWESCO International dividend yieldLululemon Athletica ROEWESCO International ROELululemon Athletica operating marginWESCO International operating marginLululemon Athletica revenue growthWESCO International revenue growthLululemon Athletica free cash flowWESCO International free cash flow
Lululemon Athletica & WESCO International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.