Is LULU or RMBS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.62 P/E and RMBS at 69.79.

Which has grown faster, LULU or RMBS?

Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.

Is LULU or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus RMBS at 31.89%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or RMBS?

Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus RMBS at 28.27%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

LULU leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs RMBS

growth of $100 · last 19y

LULU +748.4%RMBS +969.0%RMBS compounded faster

LULU RMBS

LULU vs RMBS: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($15.85B vs $13.49B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.62 vs 69.79 P/E).
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.89% vs 13.03% net margin).
•RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.51% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Which is better, LULU or RMBS?

Metric tally: LULU 9 · RMBS 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthRMBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	RMBS
P/E ratio	9.62●	69.79
Forward P/E	10.71●	49.34
P/S ratio	1.22●	22.30
P/B ratio	2.84●	11.54
PEG ratio	0.40●	1.53
EV / EBITDA	5.81●	52.03
FCF yield	9.33%●	2.08%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	RMBS
Gross margin	55.70%	77.03%●
Operating margin	18.21%	35.89%●
Net margin	13.03%	31.89%●
ROE	30.25%●	16.51%
ROIC	22.70%●	15.03%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%	23.51%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	48.76%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%	16.48%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.88%	49.06%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or RMBS?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: RMBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 9 to 7.
Is LULU or RMBS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.62 P/E and RMBS at 69.79.
Which has grown faster, LULU or RMBS?: Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.
Is LULU or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus RMBS at 31.89%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or RMBS?: Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus RMBS at 28.27%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Rambus dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Rambus ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Rambus operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Rambus revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.