Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN)
LULU leads on 7 of 7 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Rivian Automotive, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$118.77Consumer Cyclical
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
$16.76Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LULU vs RIVN
growth of $100 · last 5yLULU -74.0%RIVN -83.4%LULU compounded faster
LULU RIVN
LULU vs RIVN: by the numbers
- •RIVN is the larger company ($21.06B vs $13.49B market cap).
- •LULU is profitable (13.03% net margin) while RIVN runs a net loss (-63.62%).
Valuation
| Metric | LULU | RIVN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.62 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.71 | — |
| P/S ratio | 1.22● | 3.79 |
| P/B ratio | 2.84● | 4.75 |
| PEG ratio | 0.40 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.81 | — |
| FCF yield | 9.33% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | LULU | RIVN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.70%● | -1.72% |
| Operating margin | 18.21%● | -68.94% |
| Net margin | 13.03%● | -63.62% |
| ROE | 30.25%● | -79.88% |
| ROIC | 22.70%● | -27.94% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LULU | RIVN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.61% | — |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.02% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.36% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -18.88% | — |
Frequently asked
- Is LULU or RIVN more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus RIVN at -63.62%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lululemon Athletica P/E ratioRivian Automotive P/E ratioLululemon Athletica dividend yieldRivian Automotive dividend yieldLululemon Athletica ROERivian Automotive ROELululemon Athletica operating marginRivian Automotive operating marginLululemon Athletica revenue growthRivian Automotive revenue growthLululemon Athletica free cash flowRivian Automotive free cash flow
Lululemon Athletica & Rivian Automotive appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.