Is LULU or MAS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.52 P/E and MAS at 19.84.

Which has grown faster, LULU or MAS?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus MAS at 0.27%.

Does LULU or MAS pay a bigger dividend?

MAS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Is LULU or MAS more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus MAS at 10.90%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or MAS?

Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.38% versus MAS at 11.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Masco Corporation (MAS)

LULU leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Masco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.35B

$117.57Consumer Cyclical

MAS

Masco Corporation

$16.11B

$79.97Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs MAS

growth of $100 · last 19y

LULU +739.8%MAS +251.5%LULU compounded faster

LULU MAS

LULU vs MAS: by the numbers

•MAS is the larger company ($16.11B vs $13.35B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.52 vs 19.84 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 10.90% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 0.27% CAGR).
•MAS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LULU or MAS?

Metric tally: LULU 13 · MAS 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMAS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LULU	MAS
P/E ratio	9.52●	19.84
Forward P/E	10.70●	18.70
P/S ratio	1.21●	2.11
P/B ratio	2.81	—
PEG ratio	0.40●	5.61
EV / EBITDA	5.55●	13.29
FCF yield	9.43%●	5.81%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	MAS
Gross margin	55.70%●	35.41%
Operating margin	18.21%●	16.79%
Net margin	13.03%●	10.90%
ROE	30.25%●	-435.48%
ROIC	22.70%	26.15%●

Dividends

Metric	LULU	MAS
Dividend yield	—	1.60%
Payout ratio	—	32.99%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	MAS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%●	0.27%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%●	5.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%●	2.44%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-20.21%	8.64%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or MAS?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 13 to 2.
Is LULU or MAS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: LULU trades at a 9.52 P/E and MAS at 19.84.
Which has grown faster, LULU or MAS?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus MAS at 0.27%.
Does LULU or MAS pay a bigger dividend?: MAS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Is LULU or MAS more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus MAS at 10.90%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or MAS?: Over the past 10-year, MAS delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.38% versus MAS at 11.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full MAS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Masco P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Masco dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Masco ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Masco operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Masco revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Masco free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Masco appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.