Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)
TRNO leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
$366.81Technology
TRNO
Terreno Realty Corporation
$67.27Real Estate
Total return — LRCX vs TRNO
growth of $100 · last 16yLRCX +10784.6%TRNO +260.7%LRCX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LRCX TRNO
LRCX vs TRNO: by the numbers
- •LRCX is the larger company ($458.72B vs $7.15B market cap).
- •TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 69.21 P/E).
- •TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 30.94% net margin).
- •TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 10.31% CAGR).
- •TRNO pays the higher dividend yield (3.05% vs 0.28%).
Which is better, LRCX or TRNO?
Metric tally: LRCX 3 · TRNO 14It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRNO(lower P/E)
GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRNO(higher dividend yield)
QualityLRCX(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | LRCX | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 69.21 | 16.49● |
| Forward P/E | 46.05 | 40.04● |
| P/S ratio | 21.27 | 14.43● |
| P/B ratio | 43.57 | 1.65● |
| PEG ratio | 0.54 | 0.14● |
| EV / EBITDA | 57.60 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 1.40% | 2.87%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LRCX | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.98% | 63.89%● |
| Operating margin | 34.26% | 40.81%● |
| Net margin | 30.94% | 86.52%● |
| ROE | 63.38%● | 9.88% |
| ROIC | 34.00%● | 3.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | LRCX | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 3.05%● |
| Payout ratio | 24.22% | 52.16% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LRCX | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.31% | 20.57%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.72% | 35.52%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.28% | 22.41%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 43.19%● | 3.07% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LRCX or TRNO?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRNO (higher dividend yield); quality: LRCX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 14 to 3.
- Is LRCX or TRNO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
- Which has grown faster, LRCX or TRNO?
- Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
- Does LRCX or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?
- LRCX yields 0.28% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LRCX or TRNO more profitable?
- TRNO runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, LRCX or TRNO?
- Over the past 10-year, LRCX delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lam Research P/E ratioTerreno Realty P/E ratioLam Research dividend yieldTerreno Realty dividend yieldLam Research ROETerreno Realty ROELam Research operating marginTerreno Realty operating marginLam Research revenue growthTerreno Realty revenue growthLam Research free cash flowTerreno Realty free cash flow
Lam Research & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.