Is LRCX or POWL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, POWL is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and POWL at 57.61.

Which has grown faster, LRCX or POWL?

Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.

Does LRCX or POWL pay a bigger dividend?

LRCX yields 0.28% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LRCX or POWL more profitable?

LRCX runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus POWL at 16.51%.

Which has been the better investment, LRCX or POWL?

Over the past 10-year, LRCX delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)

POWL leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

$458.72B

$366.81Technology

POWL

Powell Industries, Inc.

$10.74B

$294.75Industrials

Total return — LRCX vs POWL

growth of $100 · last 30y

LRCX +34504.7%POWL +7124.3%LRCX compounded faster

LRCX POWL

LRCX vs POWL: by the numbers

•LRCX is the larger company ($458.72B vs $10.74B market cap).
•POWL trades at the lower earnings multiple (57.61 vs 69.21 P/E).
•LRCX converts more revenue to profit (30.94% vs 16.51% net margin).
•POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 10.31% CAGR).
•LRCX pays the higher dividend yield (0.28% vs 0.12%).

Which is better, LRCX or POWL?

Metric tally: LRCX 7 · POWL 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePOWL(lower P/E)

GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLRCX(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LRCX	POWL
P/E ratio	69.21	57.61●
Forward P/E	46.05	44.88●
P/S ratio	21.27	9.51●
P/B ratio	43.57	15.19●
PEG ratio	0.54●	1.03
EV / EBITDA	57.60	41.17●
FCF yield	1.40%	1.79%●

Profitability

Metric	LRCX	POWL
Gross margin	49.98%●	30.10%
Operating margin	34.26%●	19.76%
Net margin	30.94%●	16.51%
ROE	63.38%●	26.36%
ROIC	34.00%●	25.41%

Dividends

Metric	LRCX	POWL
Dividend yield	0.28%●	0.12%
Payout ratio	24.22%	7.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LRCX	POWL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.31%	19.84%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.72%	59.98%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.28%	34.56%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	43.19%	99.30%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LRCX or POWL?: It depends on your goal. value: POWL (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LRCX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, POWL leads 10 to 7.
Is LRCX or POWL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, POWL is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
Which has grown faster, LRCX or POWL?: Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
Does LRCX or POWL pay a bigger dividend?: LRCX yields 0.28% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LRCX or POWL more profitable?: LRCX runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus POWL at 16.51%.
Which has been the better investment, LRCX or POWL?: Over the past 10-year, LRCX delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LRCX analysis Full POWL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lam Research P/E ratio Powell Industries P/E ratio Lam Research dividend yield Powell Industries dividend yield Lam Research ROE Powell Industries ROE Lam Research operating margin Powell Industries operating margin Lam Research revenue growth Powell Industries revenue growth Lam Research free cash flow Powell Industries free cash flow

Lam Research & Powell Industries appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.