Which has grown faster, LQDT or MSC?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 18.28% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.

Is LQDT or MSC more profitable?

LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus MSC at -5.63%.

Which has been the better investment, LQDT or MSC?

Over the past 5-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 17.48% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

MSC leads on 6 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 11, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.22B

$39.00Consumer Cyclical

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$87M

$1.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LQDT vs MSC

growth of $100 · last 8y

LQDT +611.7%MSC -88.6%LQDT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LQDT MSC

LQDT vs MSC: by the numbers

•LQDT is the larger company ($1.22B vs $87M market cap).
•LQDT is profitable (6.30% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.81% vs 18.28% CAGR).

Which is better, LQDT or MSC?

Metric tally: LQDT 5 · MSC 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLQDT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LQDT	MSC
P/E ratio	41.94	—
Forward P/E	25.91	—
P/S ratio	2.62	0.12●
P/B ratio	5.67	0.17●
PEG ratio	0.80	—
EV / EBITDA	21.27	6.89●
FCF yield	6.17%	—

Profitability

Metric	LQDT	MSC
Gross margin	45.61%	68.05%●
Operating margin	8.37%	11.60%●
Net margin	6.30%●	-5.63%
ROE	13.62%●	-7.94%
ROIC	11.42%●	2.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LQDT	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.28%	69.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.58%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.73%●	-20.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.99%●	-30.17%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LQDT or MSC?: It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LQDT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSC leads 6 to 5.
Which has grown faster, LQDT or MSC?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 18.28% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.
Is LQDT or MSC more profitable?: LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus MSC at -5.63%.
Which has been the better investment, LQDT or MSC?: Over the past 5-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 17.48% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LQDT analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Liquidity Services P/E ratio Studio City International P/E ratio Liquidity Services dividend yield Studio City International dividend yield Liquidity Services ROE Studio City International ROE Liquidity Services operating margin Studio City International operating margin Liquidity Services revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth Liquidity Services free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

Liquidity Services & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 11, 2026.