Is LQDT or MHK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MHK is cheaper: LQDT trades at a 40.73 P/E and MHK at 16.71.

Which has grown faster, LQDT or MHK?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.

Is LQDT or MHK more profitable?

LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus MHK at 3.77%.

Which has been the better investment, LQDT or MHK?

Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 18.08% versus MHK at -5.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

LQDT leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though MHK is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.18B

$37.88Consumer Cyclical

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$6.79B

$111.43Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LQDT vs MHK

growth of $100 · last 20y

LQDT +208.2%MHK +32.0%LQDT compounded faster

LQDT MHK

LQDT vs MHK: by the numbers

•MHK is the larger company ($6.79B vs $1.18B market cap).
•MHK trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.71 vs 40.73 P/E).
•LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.30% vs 3.77% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 2.03% CAGR).

Which is better, LQDT or MHK?

Metric tally: LQDT 9 · MHK 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMHK(lower P/E)

GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLQDT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LQDT	MHK
P/E ratio	40.73	16.71●
Forward P/E	25.17	12.98●
P/S ratio	2.55	0.63●
P/B ratio	5.51	0.82●
PEG ratio	0.80	—
EV / EBITDA	18.86	7.20●
FCF yield	6.35%	10.32%●

Profitability

Metric	LQDT	MHK
Gross margin	45.61%●	24.34%
Operating margin	8.37%●	4.89%
Net margin	6.30%●	3.77%
ROE	13.62%●	4.95%
ROIC	11.42%●	3.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LQDT	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.76%●	2.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.58%●	-3.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.73%●	-12.83%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.03%●	-10.09%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LQDT or MHK?: It depends on your goal. value: MHK (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LQDT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LQDT leads 9 to 6.
Is LQDT or MHK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MHK is cheaper: LQDT trades at a 40.73 P/E and MHK at 16.71.
Which has grown faster, LQDT or MHK?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
Is LQDT or MHK more profitable?: LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus MHK at 3.77%.
Which has been the better investment, LQDT or MHK?: Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 18.08% versus MHK at -5.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LQDT analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Liquidity Services P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Liquidity Services dividend yield Mohawk Industries dividend yield Liquidity Services ROE Mohawk Industries ROE Liquidity Services operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin Liquidity Services revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth Liquidity Services free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

Liquidity Services & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.