Which has grown faster, LNT or SMR?

Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — LNT at a 5.38% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.

Does LNT or SMR pay a bigger dividend?

LNT pays a dividend (2.76% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Is LNT or SMR more profitable?

LNT runs the higher net margin — LNT at 18.58% versus SMR at -2066.55%.

Which has been the better investment, LNT or SMR?

Over the past 5-year, LNT delivered the higher annualized total return — LNT at 10.16% versus SMR at 0.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) vs NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)

LNT leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Alliant Energy Corporation and NuScale Power Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LNT

Alliant Energy Corporation

$19.52B

$75.59Utilities

SMR

NuScale Power Corporation

$3.04B

$10.21Utilities

Total return — LNT vs SMR

growth of $100 · last 6y

LNT +43.3%SMR +2.6%LNT compounded faster

LNT SMR

LNT vs SMR: by the numbers

•LNT is the larger company ($19.52B vs $3.04B market cap).
•LNT is profitable (18.58% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
•SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs 5.38% CAGR).
•LNT pays a dividend (2.76% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LNT or SMR?

Metric tally: LNT 7 · SMR 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLNT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LNT	SMR
P/E ratio	23.70	—
Forward P/E	20.52	—
P/S ratio	4.43●	89.54
P/B ratio	2.64	1.43●
PEG ratio	1.21	—
EV / EBITDA	15.25	—

Profitability

Metric	LNT	SMR
Gross margin	37.97%●	22.42%
Operating margin	23.01%●	-3812.57%
Net margin	18.58%●	-2066.55%
ROE	11.06%●	-33.06%
ROIC	4.12%●	-61.76%

Dividends

Metric	LNT	SMR
Dividend yield	2.76%	—
Payout ratio	66.19%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LNT	SMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.38%	120.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.98%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.57%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.49%●	0.40%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LNT or SMR?: It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LNT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LNT leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, LNT or SMR?: Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — LNT at a 5.38% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.
Does LNT or SMR pay a bigger dividend?: LNT pays a dividend (2.76% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Is LNT or SMR more profitable?: LNT runs the higher net margin — LNT at 18.58% versus SMR at -2066.55%.
Which has been the better investment, LNT or SMR?: Over the past 5-year, LNT delivered the higher annualized total return — LNT at 10.16% versus SMR at 0.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LNT analysis Full SMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Alliant Energy P/E ratio NuScale Power P/E ratio Alliant Energy dividend yield NuScale Power dividend yield Alliant Energy ROE NuScale Power ROE Alliant Energy operating margin NuScale Power operating margin Alliant Energy revenue growth NuScale Power revenue growth Alliant Energy free cash flow NuScale Power free cash flow

Alliant Energy & NuScale Power appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.